ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2022
Do different positions during a non-stress test affect the maternofetal physiological parameters and comfort in pregnant women?
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of maternal positions in electronic fetal monitoring: a randomised controlled trial.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA non-stress test (NST) is an essential diagnostic test performed during pregnancy to assess fetal well-being. It is a recording of fetal movements besides fetal heart rate, indicating fetal biophysiological well-being. As maternal physiology is altered in various positions, apt positioning during the NST is essential for accurate results while ensuring maternal comfort. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different maternal positions, left lateral and semi-fowler's, on NST reactivity, maternal blood pressure, heart rate, and comfort in pregnant women while performing the NST. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis crossover study evaluated 50 healthy pregnant women between 32 and 40 weeks of gestation with no obstetric complications for the effect of maternal positions on maternofetal physiological parameters and comfort. The NST was performed for 20 min in each position with a washout period of 10 min. The maternofetal physiological parameters were recorded by a calibrated sphygmomanometer and the electrocardiograph interpretations. The maternal comfort was assessed using a maternal comfort rating scale (MCRS) for each position after the NST. Relevant descriptive and inferential statistics are applied to compute the results.
resultsStatistically, there was a significant difference in the mean maternal blood pressure and heart rate between the left lateral and semi-fowler's positions at 0 and 20 min (
conclusionSemi-fowler's position demonstrated favorable maternal blood pressure and heart rate during the NST in the third trimester of pregnancy, though it was clinically not significant. There was no significant difference in the comfort of women in both positions. Hence, either of the positions can be implemented in practice as an alternative position while performing the NST, based on the women's preference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.