ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022
NR4A2 may be a potential diagnostic biomarker for myocardial infarction: A comprehensive bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deciphering the clinical implication of an obesity-related gene signature as the novel biomarker for acute myocardial infarction diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring biomarkers related to coagulation and immunity in myocardial infarction based on bioinformatics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Use of Machine Learning for the Identification and Validation of Immunogenic Cell Death Biomarkers and Immunophenotypes in Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Identification of key genes associated with acute myocardial infarction using WGCNA and two-sample mendelian randomization study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Investigation of the shared molecular mechanisms and hub genes between myocardial infarction and depression.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myocardial infarction is a well-established severe consequence of coronary artery disease. However, the lack of effective early biomarkers accounts for the lag time before clinical diagnosis of myocardial infarction. The present study aimed to predict critical genes for the diagnosis of MI by immune infiltration analysis and establish a nomogram. Methods: Gene microarray data were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Differential expression analysis, single-cell sequencing, and disease ontology (DO) enrichment analysis were performed to determine the distribution of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) in cell subpopulations and their correlation with MI. Next, the level of infiltration of 16 immune cells and immune functions and their hub genes were analyzed using a Single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA). In addition, the accuracy of critical markers for the diagnosis of MI was subsequently assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). One datasets were used to test the accuracy of the model. Finally, the genes with the most diagnostic value for MI were screened and experimentally validated. Results: 335 DEGs were identified in GSE66360, including 280 upregulated and 55 downregulated genes. Single-cell sequencing results demonstrated that DEGs were mainly distributed in endothelial cells. DO enrichment analysis suggested that DEGs were highly correlated with MI. In the MI population, macrophages, neutrophils, CCR, and Parainflammation were significantly upregulated compared to the average population. NR4A2 was identified as the gene with the most significant diagnostic value in the immune scoring and diagnostic model. 191 possible drugs for the treatment of myocardial infarction were identified by drug prediction analysis. Finally, our results were validated by Real-time Quantitativepolymerase chain reaction and Western Blot of animal samples. Conclusion: Our comprehensive in silico analysis revealed that NR4A2 has huge prospects for application in diagnosing patients with MI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.