Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36618270›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2022

On the similarities of representations in artificial and brain neural networks for speech recognition.

Cai Wingfield, Chao Zhang, Barry Devereux, Elisabeth Fonteneau, Andrew Thwaites, Xunying Liu, Phil Woodland, William Marslen-Wilson, Li Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cai WingfieldDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Chao ZhangDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Barry DevereuxSchool of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Elisabeth FonteneauDepartment of Psychology, University Paul Valéry Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Andrew ThwaitesDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Xunying LiuDepartment of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Phil WoodlandDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
William Marslen-WilsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Li SuDepartment of Neuroscience, Neuroscience Institute, Insigneo Institute for in silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, machines powered by deep learning have achieved near-human levels of performance in speech recognition. The fields of artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience have finally reached a similar level of performance, despite their huge differences in implementation, and so deep learning models can-in principle-serve as candidates for mechanistic models of the human auditory system. Methods: Utilizing high-performance automatic speech recognition systems, and advanced non-invasive human neuroimaging technology such as magnetoencephalography and multivariate pattern-information analysis, the current study aimed to relate machine-learned representations of speech to recorded human brain representations of the same speech. Results: In one direction, we found a quasi-hierarchical functional organization in human auditory cortex qualitatively matched with the hidden layers of deep artificial neural networks trained as part of an automatic speech recognizer. In the reverse direction, we modified the hidden layer organization of the artificial neural network based on neural activation patterns in human brains. The result was a substantial improvement in word recognition accuracy and learned speech representations. Discussion: We have demonstrated that artificial and brain neural networks can be mutually informative in the domain of speech recognition.

Indexed as

auditory cortexautomatic speech recognitiondeep neural networkrepresentational similarity analysisspeech recognition

Identifiers

PMID36618270
PMCPMC9811675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.