Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36618190›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022

Comparative study to evaluate efficacy of prolotherapy using 25% dextrose and local corticosteroid injection in tennis elbow - A prospective study.

Govind K Gupta, Sudha Rani, Dibyendu Shekhar, Unmesh K Sahoo, Shubhendu Shekhar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Govind K GuptaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Sudha RaniDepartment of Anatomy, Sheikh Bhikhari Medical College, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand, India.
Dibyendu ShekharDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Unmesh K SahooDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Shubhendu ShekharDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tennis elbow is a common painful condition with a prevalence rate of 1-3%. The condition starts as a micro-tear in extensor carpi radialis brevis and its degeneration because of repetitive overload. Conservative measures are undertaken initially because symptoms in most patients improve with time and rest. Adjunctive treatment includes steroid injection, autologous plasma, exercise, and prolotherapy. Dextrose prolotherapy by virtue of its multi-modal mechanism of action has emerged as a cost-effective treatment option for chronic musculoskeletal and arthritic pain. Materials and Methods: A total of 260 patients were included in the study and divided in two groups for administration of steroids or dextrose prolotherapy. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Mayo Elbow Performance Scale (MEPS) scores were taken for patients at regular follow-up. Results: All patients showed improvement in VAS score and MEPS score following dextrose prolotherapy as well as patients injected with steroids. Conclusion: Both prolotherapy and steroid injection offer adequate pain relief and functional outcome, although prolotherapy has been shown to be superior and given long-lasting results compared to steroid injection in management of tennis elbow.

Indexed as

Prolotherapysteroidtennis elbowVAS

Identifiers

PMID36618190
PMCPMC9810944
OpenAlexW4312752460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.