ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Facilitators and barriers influencing the post-crash emergency care of road traffic injuries in district Aligarh of Uttar Pradesh.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Road traffic injuries (RTIs) will become the fifth leading cause of death by 2030. It is often possible to mitigate the consequences of serious injury if victims have access to prompt, effective pre-hospital care within minutes following the crash. Aims: To find out the facilitators and barriers for providing post-crash emergency care in Road traffic injuries in district Aligarh. Settings and Design: The present study was undertaken on both the National highways (NH-91 and NH-93) and the bypass roads passing through district Aligarh of Uttar Pradesh. Subjects and Methods: All the individuals who met road traffic accidents (RTA) between the earmarked areas from 1 Statistical Analysis Used: Data is presented in the form of frequency tables and percentages. Results: A total of 1126 patients were interviewed during the study period. Out of 1126, 937 (83.2%) were males, and 189 (16.8%) were females, with M:F ratio being 4.96:1. Six hundred sixty-two (58.8%) of the respondents identified the layperson or common man as the first person to respond at the time of the crash. 1110 (98.58%) respondents identified the layperson as the facilitator in providing post-crash emergency care, followed by police and roadside shopkeepers/dhabawalas. The role of the layperson in calling for help by utilizing the helpline numbers, suggesting a nearby health facility together with facilitating for transportation of the victim to the nearby health facility was appreciated by the majority of the respondents. An ambulance was the best available mode of transportation. Seven hundred thirty-three (65.10%) of the total respondents were aware of the toll-free number to be dialled in case of RTA. However, only 320 (43.70%) among them used this toll-free facility after meeting the crash. Conclusion: A layperson is the single most important facilitator for providing post-crash emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.