ArticleHeliyon2023
Insight into free energy and dynamic cross-correlations of residue for binding affinity of antibody and receptor binding domain SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic evaluation framework for universal antibody-antigen binding affinity prediction and candidate recommendation.iScience · 2026Article
- Exploring the diverse binding ability of SARS-CoV-2 variant RBDs to different antibody classes: a computational study.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Fc-Binding Cyclopeptide Induces Allostery from Fc to Fab: Revealed Through in Silico Structural Analysis to Anti-Phenobarbital Antibody.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to evolve and mutate causing most of the mutated variants resist to many of the therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Despite several mAbs retained neutralizing capability for Omicron BA.1 and BA.2, reduction in neutralization potency was reported. Hence, effort of searching for mAb that is broader in neutralization breadth without losing the neutralizing ability is continued. MW06 was reported with capability in neutralizing most of the variants of concern (VOC) and it binds to the conserved region (left flank) near epitope mAb sotrovimab (S309). In this study, binding affinity of mAb MW06 and its cocktail formulation with MW05 for receptor binding domain (RBD) SARS-CoV-2 virus was investigated under molecular dynamics simulations (MDs). Binding free energies computed by Molecular Mechanics Generalised Born Surface Area (MM-GBSA) algorithm predicted the binding affinity of MW06 for RBD BA.1 (-53 kcal/mol) as strong as RBD wildtype (-58 kcal/mol) while deterioration was observed for RBD BA.2 (-43 kcal/mol). Alike S309 and MW06, simulated cocktail mAb (MW05 and MW06)-RBD interactions suggested the neutralizing capability of the cocktail formulation for RBD BA.1 and BA.2 reduced. Meanwhile, residue pairs that favour the communication between the mAb and RBD have been identified by decomposing the free energy per pairwise residue basis. Apart from understanding the effects of mutation occurred in the RBD region on human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) binding, impact of heavily mutated RBD on mAb-RBD interactions was investigated in this study as well. In addition to energetic profile obtained from MDs, plotting the dynamics cross-correlation map of the mAb-RBD complex under elastic network model (ENM) was aimed to understand the cross-correlations between residue fluctuations. It allows simple and rapid analysis on the motions or dynamics of the protein residues of mAbs and RBD in complex. Protein residues having correlated motions are normally part of the structural domains of the protein and their respective motions and protein function are related. Motion of mutated RBD residues and mAb residues was less correlated while their respective interactions energy computed to be higher. The combined techniques of MDs and ENM offered simplicity in understanding dynamics and energy contribution that explain binding affinity of mAb-RBD complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.