Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36618121›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2022

Factors associated with young adult engagement with a web-based sickle cell reproductive health intervention.

Anne O Oguntoye, Nyema T Eades, Miriam O Ezenwa, Janice Krieger, Coretta Jenerette, Maxine Adegbola, Eufemia Jacob, Versie Johnson-Mallard, Yingwei Yao, Agatha Gallo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anne O OguntoyeCollege of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Nyema T EadesCollege of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Miriam O EzenwaCollege of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Janice KriegerCollege of Journalism & Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Coretta JeneretteCollege of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Maxine AdegbolaCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
Eufemia JacobSchool of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Versie Johnson-MallardCollege of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Yingwei YaoCollege of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Agatha GalloCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Diana J WilkieCollege of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida · USThe University of Texas at Arlington · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
Tailored education for informed preproductive decisions in sickle cell diseaseU54HL090513 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI SAUNTHARARAJAH, YOGEN · 2008 to 2011
$4.5M
CHOICES for Sickle Cell Reproductive Health: RCT of a Preconception Intervention Model for a Single Gene DisorderR01HG011927 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI KALYANARAMAN, SRIRAM, WILKIE, DIANA J · 2021 to 2024
$3.0M
Sickle Cell Reproductive CHOICES: Efficacy of a Primary Prevention InterventionR01HL114404 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GALLO, AGATHA M., WILKIE, DIANA J · 2012 to 2014
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011927NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114404NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL090513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine the factors predicting the engagement of young adults who have sickle cell disease (SCD) or sickle cell trait (SCT) with an online reproductive health education intervention and engagement effects on knowledge. Methods: The cross-sectional study included 167 participants who completed the web-based intervention either face-to-face (F2F) or online delivery (OL). Measures include: time used relative to length of the intervention narration and media (engagement) and the SCKnowIQ questionnaire. Ordinal regression was conducted. Results: The sample mean age was 26-years (SD=5), 68% were female, 54% had SCD, and 68% were in the F2F group. Adjusting for age, partner sickle cell status, marital status, and education, participants who were female (p=.003), had SCD (p=.018), or had F2F delivery (p < .001) were more likely to spend more time on the intervention. Adjusting for baseline knowledge and modality, more time spent on the intervention was associated with higher posttest knowledge ( Conclusions: Future studies are necessary to understand reasons underpinning engagement and to investigate other unmeasured factors, such as intervention interactivity elements, that could also be associated with engagement. Innovation: This study of young adults with SCD or SCT provides much needed insight about their engagement with online reproductive health education.

Indexed as

EngagementReproductive health educationSickle cell diseaseSickle cell traitWebbased interventionWeb-based intervention engagement

Identifiers

PMID36618121
PMCPMC9815666
OpenAlexW4284889631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.