Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36617862›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2023

Primary care trainee nursing associates in England: a qualitative study of higher education institution perspectives.

Steve Robertson, Rachel King, Bethany Taylor, Sara Laker, Emily Wood, Michaela Senek, Angela Tod, Tony Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Steve RobertsonRCN Strategic Research Alliance, Division of Nursing & Midwifery, Health Sciences School, Barber House Annexe, 3a Clarkehouse Road, Sheffield S10 2LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5683-363X
Rachel KingRCN Strategic Research Alliance, Division of Nursing & Midwifery, Health Sciences School, Barber House Annexe, 3a Clarkehouse Road, Sheffield S10 2LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4012-0202
Bethany TaylorRCN Strategic Research Alliance, Division of Nursing & Midwifery, Health Sciences School, Barber House Annexe, 3a Clarkehouse Road, Sheffield S10 2LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4090-3047
Sara LakerRCN Strategic Research Alliance, Division of Nursing & Midwifery, Health Sciences School, Barber House Annexe, 3a Clarkehouse Road, Sheffield S10 2LA, UK.
Emily WoodRCN Strategic Research Alliance, Division of Nursing & Midwifery, Health Sciences School, Barber House Annexe, 3a Clarkehouse Road, Sheffield S10 2LA, UK.
Michaela SenekRCN Strategic Research Alliance, Division of Nursing & Midwifery, Health Sciences School, Barber House Annexe, 3a Clarkehouse Road, Sheffield S10 2LA, UK.
Angela TodRCN Strategic Research Alliance, Division of Nursing & Midwifery, Health Sciences School, Barber House Annexe, 3a Clarkehouse Road, Sheffield S10 2LA, UK.
Tony RyanRCN Strategic Research Alliance, Division of Nursing & Midwifery, Health Sciences School, Barber House Annexe, 3a Clarkehouse Road, Sheffield S10 2LA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore higher education institution (HEI) perspectives on the development and implementation of trainee nursing associates (NAs) in the primary care workforce in England.

backgroundCurrent shortages of primary health care staff have led to innovative skill mix approaches in attempts to maintain safe and effective care. In England, a new level of nursing practice, NAs, was introduced and joined the workforce in 2019. This role was envisaged as a way of bridging the skills gap between health care assistants and registered nurses and as an alternative route into registered nursing. However, there is limited evidence on programme development and implementation of trainee NAs within primary care settings and HEI perspectives on this.

methodsThis paper draws from a larger qualitative study of HEI perspectives on the trainee NA programme. Twenty-seven staff involved in training NAs, from five HEIs across England, were interviewed from June to September 2021. The interview schedule specifically included questions relating to primary care. Data relating to primary care were extracted and analysed using a combined framework and thematic analysis approach.

findingsThree themes were developed: 'Understanding the trainee role and requirements', 'Trainee support in primary care' and 'Skills and scope of practice'. It is apparent that a more limited understanding of the NA programme requirements can lead to difficulties in accessing the right support for trainees in primary care. This can create challenges for trainees in gaining the required competencies and uncertainty in understanding what constitutes a safe scope of practice within the role for both employers and trainees. It might be anticipated that as this new programme becomes more embedded in primary care, a greater understanding will develop, support will improve and the nature and scope of this new level of practice will become clearer.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareSchoolsHumansProgram DevelopmentQualitative ResearchUniversitieseducation nursinghealth workforcenursing associatessecond level nursingstaffingUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID36617862
PMCPMC9884529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.