Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36617639›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2023

Bioinspired Strategies for Wound Regeneration.

Hans I-Chen Harn, Jeffrey M Davidson, Cheng-Ming Chuong

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bioelectric state transitions enablebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hans I-Chen HarnDepartment of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA hharn@usc.edu cmchuong@usc.edu.
Jeffrey M DavidsonDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.
Cheng-Ming ChuongDepartment of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA hharn@usc.edu cmchuong@usc.edu.
University of Southern California · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Tissue Patterning in living skin and organ explantsR37AR060306 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Cheng-Ming Chuong · 2020 to 2026
$3.6M
Tissue mechanics in regenerative wound healing of the skinR01GM125322 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHUONG, CHENG-MING · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R37 AR060306NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration allows animals to replace and restore injured tissues. Animal phyla have evolved different regenerative strategies to increase survival advantages. In contrast to the earlier principle that regeneration recapitulates development, recent studies indicate that wound healing in adult mammals is modified by the inflammatory response to injury, and biochemical signaling from immune and other cellular systems may modulate wound reparative responses to achieve successful tissue regeneration. Here we briefly survey different regenerative strategies used by animals across different phyla. We next focus on skin regeneration using the mouse wound-induced hair neogenesis model as an example to show the circumstances required to rebuild a new, morphogenetically competent field in the adult mammalian skin. Parallel investigations in African spiny mice (

Indexed as

SkinWound HealingAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMurinae

Identifiers

PMID36617639
PMCPMC10317060
OpenAlexW4312131072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.