Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36617542›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2023

Predicting mortality in acutely hospitalised older patients: the impact of model dimensionality.

Alex Tsui, Petru-Daniel Tudosiu, Mikael Brudfors, Ashwani Jha, Jorge Cardoso, Sebastien Ourselin, John Ashburner, Geraint Rees, Daniel Davis, Parashkev Nachev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alex TsuiMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, London, UK. a.tsui@ucl.ac.uk.
Petru-Daniel TudosiuSchool of Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.
Mikael BrudforsSchool of Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.
Ashwani JhaUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.
Jorge CardosoSchool of Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.
Sebastien OurselinSchool of Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.
John AshburnerWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL, London, UK.
Geraint ReesUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.
Daniel DavisMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, London, UK.
Parashkev NachevUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK. p.nachev@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2718-4423

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prediction of long-term mortality following acute illness can be unreliable for older patients, inhibiting the delivery of targeted clinical interventions. The difficulty plausibly arises from the complex, multifactorial nature of the underlying biology in this population, which flexible, multimodal models based on machine learning may overcome. Here, we test this hypothesis by quantifying the comparative predictive fidelity of such models in a large consecutive sample of older patients acutely admitted to hospital and characterise their biological support.

methodsA set of 804 admission episodes involving 616 unique patients with a mean age of 84.5 years consecutively admitted to the Acute Geriatric service at University College Hospital were identified, in whom clinical diagnoses, blood tests, cognitive status, computed tomography of the head, and mortality within 600 days after admission were available. We trained and evaluated out-of-sample an array of extreme gradient boosted trees-based predictive models of incrementally greater numbers of investigational modalities and modelled features. Both linear and non-linear associations with investigational features were quantified.

resultsPredictive models of mortality showed progressively increasing fidelity with greater numbers of modelled modalities and dimensions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve rose from 0.67 (sd = 0.078) for age and sex to 0.874 (sd = 0.046) for the most comprehensive model. Extracranial bone and soft tissue features contributed more than intracranial features towards long-term mortality prediction. The anterior cingulate and angular gyri, and serum albumin, were the greatest intracranial and biochemical model contributors respectively.

conclusionsHigh-dimensional, multimodal predictive models of mortality based on routine clinical data offer higher predictive fidelity than simpler models, facilitating individual level prognostication and interventional targeting. The joint contributions of both extracranial and intracranial features highlight the potential importance of optimising somatic as well as neural functions in healthy ageing. Our findings suggest a promising path towards a high-fidelity, multimodal index of frailty.

Indexed as

FrailtyHospitalizationAgedAged, 80 and overHospital MortalityHumansRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBrain imagingFrailtyGeriatricsMortality predictionMulti-modal modelling

Identifiers

PMID36617542
PMCPMC9827638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.