ArticleEpilepsia2023
MEG abnormalities and mechanisms of surgical failure in neocortical epilepsy.
Article in Epilepsia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complementary predictive value of electromagnetic source imaging and hemodynamic responses in epilepsy surgery: A quantitative spatial analysis.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Human cortical dynamics reflect graded contributions of local geometry and network topography.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Personalized biomarkers of multiscale functional alterations in temporal lobe epilepsy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Multi-centre normative brain mapping of intracranial EEG lifespan patterns in the human brain.Brain structure & function · 2025Article
- Surgical targeting of lateralizedEpilepsia · 2025Article
- From Bedside to Desktop: A Data Protocol for Normative Intracranial EEG and Abnormality Mapping.Bio-protocol · 2025Article
- Alpha rhythm slowing in temporal lobe epilepsy across scalp EEG and MEG.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Visualization of the Spatiotemporal Propagation of Interictal Spikes in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A MEG Pilot Study.Brain topography · 2024Article
- Further advances in epilepsy.Journal of neurology · 2023Review
- Article
- Identifying epileptogenic abnormalities through spatial clustering of MEG interictal band power.Epilepsia open · 2023Article
- Normative brain mapping using scalp EEG and potential clinical application.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Temporal stability of intracranial electroencephalographic abnormality maps for localizing epileptogenic tissue.Epilepsia · 2023Article
- Interictal MEG abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome.ArXiv · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Interictal magnetoencephalography abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome.Brain communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEpilepsy surgery fails to achieve seizure freedom in 30%-40% of cases. It is not fully understood why some surgeries are unsuccessful. By comparing interictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) band power from patient data to normative maps, which describe healthy spatial and population variability, we identify patient-specific abnormalities relating to surgical failure. We propose three mechanisms contributing to poor surgical outcome: (1) not resecting the epileptogenic abnormalities (mislocalization), (2) failing to remove all epileptogenic abnormalities (partial resection), and (3) insufficiently impacting the overall cortical abnormality. Herein we develop markers of these mechanisms, validating them against patient outcomes.
methodsResting-state MEG recordings were acquired for 70 healthy controls and 32 patients with refractory neocortical epilepsy. Relative band-power spatial maps were computed using source-localized recordings. Patient and region-specific band-power abnormalities were estimated as the maximum absolute z-score across five frequency bands using healthy data as a baseline. Resected regions were identified using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We hypothesized that our mechanistically interpretable markers would discriminate patients with and without postoperative seizure freedom.
resultsOur markers discriminated surgical outcome groups (abnormalities not targeted: area under the curve [AUC] = 0.80, p = .003; partial resection of epileptogenic zone: AUC = 0.68, p = .053; and insufficient cortical abnormality impact: AUC = 0.64, p = .096). Furthermore, 95% of those patients who were not seizure-free had markers of surgical failure for at least one of the three proposed mechanisms. In contrast, of those patients without markers for any mechanism, 80% were ultimately seizure-free. SIGNIFICANCE: The mapping of abnormalities across the brain is important for a wide range of neurological conditions. Here we have demonstrated that interictal MEG band-power mapping has merit for the localization of pathology and improving our mechanistic understanding of epilepsy. Our markers for mechanisms of surgical failure could be used in the future to construct predictive models of surgical outcome, aiding clinical teams during patient pre-surgical evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.