Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36617304›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2023

Invited Commentary: Some Social Epidemiologic Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Alina S Schnake-Mahl, Usama Bilal

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alina S Schnake-Mahl
Usama Bilal

Funding

The Health Consequences of Urban ScalingDP5OD026429 · OD · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI BILAL, USAMA · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Social and policy determinants and impacts on COVID-19 and influenza disparitiesK01AI168579 · NIAID · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI Alina Schnake-Mahl · 2022 to 2026
$601k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI168579NIH HHS DP5 OD026429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In their recent article, Dimitris et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2022;191(6):980-986) presented a series of challenges modern epidemiology has faced during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, including challenges around the scientific progress, epidemiologic methods, interventions, equity, team science, and training needed to address these issues. Here, 2 social epidemiologists who have been working on COVID-19 inequities reflect on further lessons with an added year of perspective. We focus on 2 key challenges: 1) dominant biomedical individualistic narratives around the production of population health, and 2) the role of profit in policy-making. We articulate a need to consider social epidemiologic approaches, including acknowledging the importance of considering how societal systems lead to health inequities. To address these challenges, future (and current) epidemiologists should be trained in theories of population health distribution and political structures of governance. Last, we close with the need for better investment in public health infrastructure as a crucial step toward achieving population health equity.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public HealthEpidemiologic MethodsHumansPandemicsPolicy Makingcoronavirus disease 2019COVID-19health equitypandemicssocial epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID36617304
PMCPMC10505416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.