Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36617302›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2023

Epidemiologic Utility of a Framework for Partition Number Selection When Dissecting Hierarchically Clustered Genetic Data Evaluated on the Intestinal Parasite Cyclospora cayetanensis.

Joel L N Barratt, Mateusz M Plucinski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic characterization ofLancet regional health. Americas · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Novel insights on the genetic population structure of human-infectingCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joel L N Barratt
Mateusz M Plucinski
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparing parasite genotypes to inform parasitic disease outbreak investigations involves computation of genetic distances that are typically analyzed by hierarchical clustering to identify related isolates, indicating a common source. A limitation of hierarchical clustering is that hierarchical clusters are not discrete; they are nested. Consequently, small groups of similar isolates exist within larger groups that get progressively larger as relationships become increasingly distant. Investigators must dissect hierarchical trees at a partition number ensuring grouped isolates belong to the same strain; a process typically performed subjectively, introducing bias into resultant groupings. We describe an unbiased, probabilistic framework for partition number selection that ensures partitions comprise isolates that are statistically likely to belong to the same strain. We computed distances and established a normalized distribution of background distances that we used to demarcate a threshold below which the closeness of relationships is unlikely to be random. Distances are hierarchically clustered and the dendrogram dissected at a partition number where most within-partition distances fall below the threshold. We evaluated this framework by partitioning 1,137 clustered Cyclospora cayetanensis genotypes, including 552 isolates epidemiologically linked to various outbreaks. The framework was 91% sensitive and 100% specific in assigning epidemiologically linked isolates to the same partition.

Indexed as

CyclosporaCyclosporiasisParasitesAnimalsCluster AnalysisGenotypeHumansdendrogramframeworkgenetic distancehierarchical clusteringoutbreakspartitioningthresholdtree dissection

Identifiers

PMID36617302
PMCPMC10165878
OpenAlexW4313729793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.