ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2023
Epidemiologic Utility of a Framework for Partition Number Selection When Dissecting Hierarchically Clustered Genetic Data Evaluated on the Intestinal Parasite Cyclospora cayetanensis.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic characterization ofLancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
- Applying prospective tree-temporal scan statistics to genomic surveillance data to detect emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants and salmonellosis clusters in New York City.International journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Cyclospora Genotypic Variations and Associated Epidemiologic Characteristics, United States, 2018-2021.Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Increased Genetic Resolution and Utility for Source Tracking of a Recently Developed Method for GenotypingMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Optimizing hierarchical tree dissection parameters using historic epidemiologic data as 'ground truth'.PloS one · 2023Article
- Novel insights on the genetic population structure of human-infectingCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2023Article
- An improved framework for detecting discrete epidemiologically meaningful partitions in hierarchically clustered genetic data.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Comparing parasite genotypes to inform parasitic disease outbreak investigations involves computation of genetic distances that are typically analyzed by hierarchical clustering to identify related isolates, indicating a common source. A limitation of hierarchical clustering is that hierarchical clusters are not discrete; they are nested. Consequently, small groups of similar isolates exist within larger groups that get progressively larger as relationships become increasingly distant. Investigators must dissect hierarchical trees at a partition number ensuring grouped isolates belong to the same strain; a process typically performed subjectively, introducing bias into resultant groupings. We describe an unbiased, probabilistic framework for partition number selection that ensures partitions comprise isolates that are statistically likely to belong to the same strain. We computed distances and established a normalized distribution of background distances that we used to demarcate a threshold below which the closeness of relationships is unlikely to be random. Distances are hierarchically clustered and the dendrogram dissected at a partition number where most within-partition distances fall below the threshold. We evaluated this framework by partitioning 1,137 clustered Cyclospora cayetanensis genotypes, including 552 isolates epidemiologically linked to various outbreaks. The framework was 91% sensitive and 100% specific in assigning epidemiologically linked isolates to the same partition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.