Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36617272›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2023

Mycoparasites, Gut Dwellers, and Saprotrophs: Phylogenomic Reconstructions and Comparative Analyses of Kickxellomycotina Fungi.

Nicole K Reynolds, Jason E Stajich, Gerald L Benny, Kerrie Barry, Stephen Mondo, Kurt LaButti, Anna Lipzen, Chris Daum, Igor V Grigoriev, Hsiao-Man Ho and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Phylogenetically diverse MucoralesMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  3. Three new species (MycoKeys · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Mycoscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Poplar: a phylogenomics pipeline.Bioinformatics advances · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicole K ReynoldsDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Florida.ORCID 0000-0001-6380-7539
Jason E StajichDepartment of Microbiology & Plant Pathology and Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California-Riverside.ORCID 0000-0002-7591-0020
Gerald L BennyDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Florida.
Kerrie BarryU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Stephen MondoU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Kurt LaButtiU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Anna LipzenU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Chris DaumU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Igor V GrigorievU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.ORCID 0000-0002-3136-8903
Hsiao-Man HoDepartment of Science Education, University of Education, 134, Section 2, Heping E. Road, National Taipei, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
Pedro W CrousDepartment of Evolutionary Phytopathology, Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Joseph W SpataforaDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University.
Matthew E SmithDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-0878-0932
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of Florida · USNational Taipei University of Education · TWOregon State University · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute · NL

Funding

National Science Foundation DEB 1441677Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy DE-AC02-05CH11231USDA-NIFA FLA-PLP-005289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved sequencing technologies have profoundly altered global views of fungal diversity and evolution. High-throughput sequencing methods are critical for studying fungi due to the cryptic, symbiotic nature of many species, particularly those that are difficult to culture. However, the low coverage genome sequencing (LCGS) approach to phylogenomic inference has not been widely applied to fungi. Here we analyzed 171 Kickxellomycotina fungi using LCGS methods to obtain hundreds of marker genes for robust phylogenomic reconstruction. Additionally, we mined our LCGS data for a set of nine rDNA and protein coding genes to enable analyses across species for which no LCGS data were obtained. The main goals of this study were to: 1) evaluate the quality and utility of LCGS data for both phylogenetic reconstruction and functional annotation, 2) test relationships among clades of Kickxellomycotina, and 3) perform comparative functional analyses between clades to gain insight into putative trophic modes. In opposition to previous studies, our nine-gene analyses support two clades of arthropod gut dwelling species and suggest a possible single evolutionary event leading to this symbiotic lifestyle. Furthermore, we resolve the mycoparasitic Dimargaritales as the earliest diverging clade in the subphylum and find four major clades of Coemansia species. Finally, functional analyses illustrate clear variation in predicted carbohydrate active enzymes and secondary metabolites (SM) based on ecology, that is biotroph versus saprotroph. Saprotrophic Kickxellales broadly lack many known pectinase families compared with saprotrophic Mucoromycota and are depauperate for SM but have similar numbers of predicted chitinases as mycoparasitic.

Indexed as

ArthropodsFungiAnimalsBase SequenceGenomeHumansPhylogenyAutomatic Assembly for the FungiFunannotatelow coverage phylogenomicsPHYlingtrichomycetes

Identifiers

PMID36617272
PMCPMC9866270
OpenAlexW4313729212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.