ArticleJournal of animal science2023
Amino acid digestibility and protein quality of mealworm-based ingredients using the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accessing the impact of harvest weights of Tenebrio molitor on amino acid digestibility and metabolizable energy in cecectomized laying hens.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Article
- The Safety of FeedKind PetAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Standardized Amino Acid Digestibility Estimates of Individual Ingredients from Precision-Fed Cecectomized Roosters Are Additive.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Evaluation of nutritional values of defatted black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae meal using the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Amino acid digestibility and protein quality of fermented soybean-based ingredients using the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Amino acid digestibility of yellow mealworm-based ingredients using the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation and multi-angle laser light scattering: A new analytical approach for the characterisation of insect protein aggregation/polymerisation after heat treatment ofCurrent research in food science · 2025Article
- Insect-based diet in animals: implications for gut microbiota.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2023Article
- Comparing the standardized amino acid digestibility of an alternative protein source with commercially available protein-based ingredients using the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Standardized amino acid digestibility and nitrogen-corrected true metabolizable energy of frozen raw, freeze-dried raw, fresh, and extruded dog foods using precision-fed cecectomized and conventional rooster assays.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mealworms may serve as an alternative protein source for pet foods because of their high protein content and low environmental footprint. The amino acid (AA) content and protein quality of mealworm-based ingredients may vary depending on their composition and processing, however, so testing is required. Our objective was to measure the AA composition, AA digestibility, and protein quality of mealworm-based ingredients using the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay. The University of Illinois Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all animal procedures prior to experimentation. Sixteen cecectomized roosters (4 roosters per substrate) were randomly allotted to one of four test substrates: 1) whole lesser mealworm (A. diaperinus) meal (ADw); 2) defatted lesser mealworm (A. diaperinus) meal (ADd); 3) defatted yellow mealworm (T. molitor) meal (TMd); and 4) hydrolyzed T. molitor protein meal (TMh). Ingredients were provided by Ÿnsect, France. After 26 h of feed withdrawal, roosters were tube-fed test substrates. Following crop intubation, excreta samples were collected for 48 h. Endogenous loss corrections for AA were made by using five additional cecectomized roosters. All data were analyzed using SAS version 9.4. All substrates had high AA digestibilities, with all indispensable AA digestibilities being >90% with the exception of histidine (87.9% to 91.1%) and valine (77.9% to 79.7%). Amino acid digestibilities were not different among substrates (P > 0.05). Digestible indispensable AA score (DIAAS)-like values were calculated to determine protein quality according to Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) nutrient profiles, The European Pet Food Industry Nutritional Guidelines (FEDIAF) nutritional guidelines, National Research Council (NRC) recommended allowances for adult dogs, adult cats, growing puppies, and growing kittens, and NRC minimal requirements for growing puppies and growing kittens. In general, TMh had the highest and TMd had the lowest DIAAS-like values for most indispensable AA. Methionine (TMh; TMd; ADw) and phenylalanine (ADd) were the first-limiting AA. Our results demonstrate that mealworm-based ingredients are high-quality protein sources. Further research in dogs and cats is necessary to confirm sufficient palatability and digestibility, but these data suggest that they are valuable sources of protein for pet foods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.