Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36617188›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023

Dose and organ displacement comparisons with breast conservative radiotherapy using abdominal and thoracic deep-inspiration breath-holds: A comparative dosimetric study.

Yoshitsugu Matsumoto, Etsuo Kunieda, Natsumi Futakami, Takeshi Akiba, Ryuta Nagao, Tsuyoshi Fukuzawa, Tomomi Katsumata, Toshihisa Kuroki, Tatsuya Mikami, Yoji Nakano and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshitsugu MatsumotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Etsuo KuniedaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Natsumi FutakamiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi AkibaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryuta NagaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tsuyoshi FukuzawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomomi KatsumataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Toshihisa KurokiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tatsuya MikamiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yoji NakanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhiro OkumuraDepartment of Radiology, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kenji SoudaDepartment of Radiology, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Eride MutuCourse of Advanced Medical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Akitomo SugawaraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tokai University · JPTokai University Hachioji Hospital · JPTokai University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reduces the radiation dose to the heart and lungs during breast radiotherapy in cancer. However, there is not enough discussion about suitable breathing methods for DIBH. Therefore, we investigated the radiation doses and organ and body surface displacement in abdominal DIBH (A-DIBH) and thoracic DIBH (T-DIBH). Free-breathing, A-DIBH, and T-DIBH computed tomography images of 100 patients were used. After contouring the targets, heart, and lungs, radiotherapy plans were created. We investigated the heart and lung doses, the associations between the heart and left lung displacements, and the thorax and abdominal surface displacements. No significant differences were observed in the target dose indices. However, the heart and lung doses were significantly lower in A-DIBH than in T-DIBH for all the indices; the mean heart and lung doses were 1.69 and 3.48 Gy, and 1.91 and 3.55 Gy in A-DIBH and T-DIBH, respectively. The inferior displacement of the heart and the left lung was more significant in A-DIBH. Therefore, inferior expansion of the heart and lungs may be responsible for the respective dose reductions. The abdominal surface displaced more than the thoracic surface in both A-DIBH and T-DIBH, and thoracic surface displacement was greater in T-DIBH than in A-DIBH. Moreover, A-DIBH can be identified because abdominal surface displacement was greater in A-DIBH than in T-DIBH. In conclusion, A-DIBH and T-DIBH could be distinguished by comparing the abdominal and thoracic surfaces of A-DIBH and T-DIBH, thereby ensuring the implementation of A-DIBH and reducing the heart and lung doses.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsUnilateral Breast NeoplasmsBreastBreath HoldingFemaleHeartHumansLungOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedabdominal deep-inspiration breath-holdbody surfacebreast cancerradiation dosesradiotherapythoracic deep-inspiration breath-hold

Identifiers

PMID36617188
PMCPMC10113706
OpenAlexW4313706866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.