Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36617138›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Experimental Procedure for the Metrological Characterization of Time-of-Flight Cameras for Human Body 3D Measurements.

Simone Pasinetti, Cristina Nuzzi, Alessandro Luchetti, Matteo Zanetti, Matteo Lancini, Mariolino De Cecco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simone PasinettiDepartment of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering, University of Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25125 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5098-6395
Cristina NuzziDepartment of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering, University of Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25125 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5530-6136
Alessandro LuchettiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, Via Sommarive, 9, 38123 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0960-0996
Matteo ZanettiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, Via Sommarive, 9, 38123 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8813-215X
Matteo LanciniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Radiology and Public Health, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2301-876X
Mariolino De CeccoDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, Via Sommarive, 9, 38123 Trento, Italy.
University of Brescia · ITUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time-of-flight cameras are widely adopted in a variety of indoor applications ranging from industrial object measurement to human activity recognition. However, the available products may differ in terms of the quality of the acquired point cloud, and the datasheet provided by the constructors may not be enough to guide researchers in the choice of the perfect device for their application. Hence, this work details the experimental procedure to assess time-of-flight cameras' error sources that should be considered when designing an application involving time-of-flight technology, such as the bias correction and the temperature influence on the point cloud stability. This is the first step towards a standardization of the metrological characterization procedure that could ensure the robustness and comparability of the results among tests and different devices. The procedure was conducted on Kinect Azure, Basler Blaze 101, and Basler ToF 640 cameras. Moreover, we compared the devices in the task of 3D reconstruction following a procedure involving the measure of both an object and a human upper-body-shaped mannequin. The experiment highlighted that, despite the results of the previously conducted metrological characterization, some devices showed evident difficulties in reconstructing the target objects. Thus, we proved that performing a rigorous evaluation procedure similar to the one proposed in this paper is always necessary when choosing the right device.

Indexed as

Human BodyHumansAzure KinectBasler Blaze 101human-body reconstructionmachine visionmetrological characterizationtime-of-flight

Identifiers

PMID36617138
PMCPMC9824796
OpenAlexW4313572854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.