Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36617115›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Joint-Based Action Progress Prediction.

Davide Pucci, Federico Becattini, Alberto Del Bimbo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Davide PucciMedia Integration and Communication Center (MICC), University of Florence, 50124 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4424-9185
Federico BecattiniMedia Integration and Communication Center (MICC), University of Florence, 50124 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2537-2700
Alberto Del BimboMedia Integration and Communication Center (MICC), University of Florence, 50124 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1052-8322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Action understanding is a fundamental computer vision branch for several applications, ranging from surveillance to robotics. Most works deal with localizing and recognizing the action in both time and space, without providing a characterization of its evolution. Recent works have addressed the prediction of action progress, which is an estimate of how far the action has advanced as it is performed. In this paper, we propose to predict action progress using a different modality compared to previous methods: body joints. Human body joints carry very precise information about human poses, which we believe are a much more lightweight and effective way of characterizing actions and therefore their execution. Estimating action progress can in fact be determined based on the understanding of how key poses follow each other during the development of an activity. We show how an action progress prediction model can exploit body joints and integrate it with modules providing keypoint and action information in order to be run directly from raw pixels. The proposed method is experimentally validated on the Penn Action Dataset.

Indexed as

action progress predictionbody jointsbody pose

Identifiers

PMID36617115
PMCPMC9824535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.