Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36617107›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

An Investigation of Signal Preprocessing for Photoacoustic Tomography.

Isaac Huen, Ruochong Zhang, Renzhe Bi, Xiuting Li, Mohesh Moothanchery, Malini Olivo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isaac HuenInstitute of Bioengineering and Bioimaging, A*STAR, 11 Biopolis Way, Singapore 639798, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0359-9445
Ruochong ZhangInstitute of Bioengineering and Bioimaging, A*STAR, 11 Biopolis Way, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
Renzhe BiInstitute of Bioengineering and Bioimaging, A*STAR, 11 Biopolis Way, Singapore 639798, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7173-064X
Xiuting LiInstitute of Bioengineering and Bioimaging, A*STAR, 11 Biopolis Way, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
Mohesh MoothancheryInstitute of Bioengineering and Bioimaging, A*STAR, 11 Biopolis Way, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
Malini OlivoInstitute of Bioengineering and Bioimaging, A*STAR, 11 Biopolis Way, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SG

Funding

Agency for Science, Technology and Research BMRC Central Research Fund (UIBR) 2021Agency for Science, Technology and Research Horizontal Technology Programme, Office Seed Fund, Biomedical Engineering Programme 2021, C211318004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is increasingly being used for high-resolution biological imaging at depth. Signal-to-noise ratios and resolution are the main factors that determine image quality. Various reconstruction algorithms have been proposed and applied to reduce noise and enhance resolution, but the efficacy of signal preprocessing methods which also affect image quality, are seldom discussed. We, therefore, compared common preprocessing techniques, namely bandpass filters, wavelet denoising, empirical mode decomposition, and singular value decomposition. Each was compared with and without accounting for sensor directivity. The denoising performance was evaluated with the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and the resolution was calculated as the full width at half maximum (FWHM) in both the lateral and axial directions. In the phantom experiment, counting in directivity was found to significantly reduce noise, outperforming other methods. Irrespective of directivity, the best performing methods for denoising were bandpass, unfiltered, SVD, wavelet, and EMD, in that order. Only bandpass filtering consistently yielded improvements. Significant improvements in the lateral resolution were observed using directivity in two out of three acquisitions. This study investigated the advantages and disadvantages of different preprocessing methods and may help to determine better practices in PAT reconstruction.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingSignal-To-Noise RatioCNRphotoacoustic tomographypreprocessingresolutionwavelet denoising

Identifiers

PMID36617107
PMCPMC9823775
OpenAlexW4313515817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.