Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36617096›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Assessment of Motor Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis.

Joško Šoda, Sanda Pavelin, Igor Vujović, Maja Rogić Vidaković

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joško ŠodaSignal Processing, Analysis, and Advanced Diagnostics Research and Education Laboratory (SPAADREL), Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-5825-8026
Sanda PavelinDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Igor VujovićSignal Processing, Analysis, and Advanced Diagnostics Research and Education Laboratory (SPAADREL), Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-1461
Maja Rogić VidakovićLaboratory for Human and Experimental Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-8516-9718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive technique mainly used for the assessment of corticospinal tract integrity and excitability of the primary motor cortices. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) play a pivotal role in TMS studies. TMS clinical guidelines, concerning the use and interpretation of MEPs in diagnosing and monitoring corticospinal tract integrity in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), were established almost ten years ago and refer mainly to the use of TMS implementation; this comprises the magnetic stimulator connected to a standard EMG unit, with the positioning of the coil performed by using the external landmarks on the head. The aim of the present work was to conduct a narrative literature review on the MEP assessment and outcome measures in clinical and research settings, assessed by TMS Methodological characteristics of different TMS system implementations (TMS without navigation, line-navigated TMS and e-field-navigated TMS); these were discussed in the context of mapping the corticospinal tract integrity in MS. An MEP assessment of two case reports, by using an e-field-navigated TMS, was presented; the results of the correspondence between the e-field-navigated TMS with MRI, and the EDSS classifications were presented. Practical and technical guiding principles for the improvement of TMS studies in MEP assessment for MS are discussed, suggesting the use of e-field TMS assessment in the sense that it can improve the accuracy of corticospinal tract integrity testing by providing a more objective correspondence of the neurophysiological (e-field-navigated TMS) and clinical (Expanded Disability Status Scale-EDSS) classifications.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorMultiple SclerosisElectromyographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTranscranial Magnetic Stimulatione-field navigationevoked potentialsline navigationMEPmotor evoked potentialsmultiple sclerosisnavigated TMSTMS

Identifiers

PMID36617096
PMCPMC9824873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.