ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Comparison of Performance of Predicting the Wear Amount of Tire Tread Depending on Sensing Information.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting the Wear Amount of Tire Tread Using 1D-CNN.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Excessive tire wear can affect vehicle driving safety. While there are various methods for predicting the tire wear amount in real-time, it is unclear which method is the most effective in terms of the difficulty of sensing and prediction accuracy. The current study aims to develop prediction algorithms of tire wear and compare their performances. A finite element tire model was developed and validated against experimental data. Parametric tire rolling simulations were conducted using various driving and tire wear conditions to obtain tire internal accelerations. Machine-learning-based algorithms for tire wear prediction utilizing various sensing options were developed, and their performances were compared. A wheel translational and rotational speed-based (V and ω) method resulted in an average prediction error of 1.2 mm. Utilizing the internal pressure and vertical load of the tire with the V and ω improved the prediction accuracy to 0.34 mm. Acceleration-based methods resulted in an average prediction error of 0.6 mm. An algorithm using both the vehicle and tire information showed the best performance with a prediction error of 0.21 mm. When accounting for sensing cost, the V and ω-based method seems to be promising option. This finding needs to be experimentally verified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.