ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Monitoring the Production Information of Conventional Machining Equipment Based on Edge Computing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A production status monitoring method based on edge computing is proposed for traditional machining offline equipment to address the deficiencies that traditional machining offline equipment have, which cannot automatically count the number of parts produced, obtain part processing time information, and discern anomalous operation status. Firstly, the total current signal of the collected equipment was filtered to extract the processing segment data. The processing segment data were then used to manually calibrate the feature vector of the equipment for specific parts and processes, and the feature vector was used as a reference to match with the real-time electric current data on the edge device to identify and obtain the processing start time, processing end time, and anomalous marks for each part. Finally, the information was uploaded to further obtain the part processing time, loading and unloading standby time, and the cause of the anomaly. To verify the reliability of the method, a prototype system was built, and extensive experiments were conducted on many different types of equipment in an auto parts manufacturer. The experimental results show that the proposed monitoring algorithm based on the calibration vector can stably and effectively identify the production information of each part on an independently developed edge device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.