Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36616928›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Validity of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters in Healthy Young Adults Using a Motion-Sensor-Based Gait Analysis System (ORPHE ANALYTICS) during Walking and Running.

Yuki Uno, Issei Ogasawara, Shoji Konda, Natsuki Yoshida, Naoki Otsuka, Yuya Kikukawa, Akira Tsujii, Ken Nakata

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuki UnoDepartment of Health and Sport Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1579-2736
Issei OgasawaraDepartment of Health and Sport Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4176-689X
Shoji KondaDepartment of Health and Sport Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8252-7281
Natsuki YoshidaDepartment of Health and Sport Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Naoki OtsukaORPHE Inc., Shibuya 151-0053, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuya KikukawaORPHE Inc., Shibuya 151-0053, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira TsujiiDepartment of Sports Medical Biomechanics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3424-4746
Ken NakataDepartment of Health and Sport Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka University of Health and Sport Sciences · JPShibuya (Japan) · JPThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology JPMXP0518071489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motion sensors are widely used for gait analysis. The validity of commercial gait analysis systems is of great interest because calculating position/angle-level gait parameters potentially produces an error in the integration process of the motion sensor data; moreover, the validity of ORPHE ANALYTICS, a motion-sensor-based gait analysis system, has not yet been examined. We examined the validity of the gait parameters calculated using ORPHE ANALYTICS relative to those calculated using conventional optical motion capture. Nine young adults performed gait tasks on a treadmill at speeds of 2−12 km/h. The three-dimensional position data and acceleration and angular velocity data of the feet were collected. The gait parameters were calculated from motion sensor data using ORPHE ANALYTICS, and optical motion capture data. Intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC(2,1)] were calculated for relative validities. Eight items, namely, stride duration, stride length, stride frequency, stride speed, vertical height, stance phase duration, swing phase duration, and sagittal angleIC exhibited excellent relative validities [ICC(2,1) > 0.9]. In contrast, sagittal angleTO and frontal angleIC demonstrated good [ICC(2,1) = 0.892−0.833] and moderate relative validity [ICC(2,1) = 0.566−0.627], respectively. ORPHE ANALYTICS was found to exhibit excellent relative validities for most gait parameters. These results suggest its feasibility for gait analysis outside the laboratory setting.

Indexed as

Gait AnalysisRunningBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansReproducibility of ResultsSpatio-Temporal AnalysisWalkingYoung Adultfoot-mounted sensorfoot-strike patterninertial measurement unit (IMU)reliabilityvalidation studywearable devices

Identifiers

PMID36616928
PMCPMC9823871
OpenAlexW4313328019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.