ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Sleep Quality Evaluation Based on Single-Lead Wearable Cardiac Cycle Acquisition Device.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between polysomnography-measured sleep parameters and cognitive impairment in elderly patients with depression.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- The value of circadian heart rate variability for the estimation of obstructive sleep apnea severity in adult males.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In clinical conditions, polysomnography (PSG) is regarded as the "golden standard" for detecting sleep disease and offering a reference of objective sleep quality. For healthy adults, scores from sleep questionnaires are more reliable than other methods in obtaining knowledge of subjective sleep quality. In practice, the need to simplify PSG to obtain subjective sleep quality by recording a few channels of physiological signals such as single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) or photoplethysmography (PPG) signal is still very urgent. This study provided a two-step method to differentiate sleep quality into "good sleep" and "poor sleep" based on the single-lead wearable cardiac cycle data, with the comparison of the subjective sleep questionnaire score. First, heart rate variability (HRV) features and ECG-derived respiration features were extracted to construct a sleep staging model (wakefulness (W), rapid eye movement (REM), light sleep (N1&N2) and deep sleep (N3)) using the multi-classifier fusion method. Then, features extracted from the sleep staging results were used to construct a sleep quality evaluation model, i.e., classifying the sleep quality as good and poor. The accuracy of the sleep staging model, tested on the international public database, was 0.661 and 0.659 in Cardiology Challenge 2018 training database and Sleep Heart Health Study Visit 1 database, respectively. The accuracy of the sleep quality evaluation model was 0.786 for our recording subjects, with an average F
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.