ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Electroencephalography Reflects User Satisfaction in Controlling Robot Hand through Electromyographic Signals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Frontiers in Robotic Upper-Limb Prostheses: Mechanisms, Materials, Tactile Sensors and Machine Learning-Based EMG Control: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Quality of Experience (QoE) in Cloud Gaming: A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Techniques via Facial Emotions in a Virtual Reality Environment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Neural Mechanism of Musical Pleasure Induced by Prediction Errors: An EEG Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study addresses time intervals during robot control that dominate user satisfaction and factors of robot movement that induce satisfaction. We designed a robot control system using electromyography signals. In each trial, participants were exposed to different experiences as the cutoff frequencies of a low-pass filter were changed. The participants attempted to grab a bottle by controlling a robot. They were asked to evaluate four indicators (stability, imitation, response time, and movement speed) and indicate their satisfaction at the end of each trial by completing a questionnaire. The electroencephalography signals of the participants were recorded while they controlled the robot and responded to the questionnaire. Two independent component clusters in the precuneus and postcentral gyrus were the most sensitive to subjective evaluations. For the moment that dominated satisfaction, we observed that brain activity exhibited significant differences in satisfaction not immediately after feeding an input but during the later stage. The other indicators exhibited independently significant patterns in event-related spectral perturbations. Comparing these indicators in a low-frequency band related to the satisfaction with imitation and movement speed, which had significant differences, revealed that imitation covered significant intervals in satisfaction. This implies that imitation was the most important contributing factor among the four indicators. Our results reveal that regardless of subjective satisfaction, objective performance evaluation might more fully reflect user satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.