ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Improving Fingerprint-Based Positioning by Using IEEE 802.11mc FTM/RTT Observables.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mobile Robot Positioning with Wireless Fidelity Fingerprinting and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Survey of the Performance-Limiting Factors of a 2-Dimensional RSS Fingerprinting-Based Indoor Wireless Localization System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Received signal strength (RSS) has been one of the most used observables for location purposes due to its availability at almost every wireless device. However, the volatile nature of RSS tends to yield to non-reliable location solutions. IEEE 802.11mc enabled the use of the round trip time (RTT) for positioning, which is expected to be a more consistent observable for location purposes. This approach has been gaining support from several companies such as Google, which introduced that feature in the Android O.S. As a result, RTT estimation is now available in several recent off-the-shelf devices, opening a wide range of new approaches for computing location. However, RTT has been traditionally addressed to multilateration solutions. Few works exist that assess the feasibility of the RTT as an accurate feature in positioning methods based on classification algorithms. An attempt is made in this paper to fill this gap by investigating the performance of several classification models in terms of accuracy and positioning errors. The performance is assessed using different AP layouts, distinct AP vendors, and different frequency bands. The accuracy and precision of the RTT-based position estimation is always better than the one obtained with RSS in all the studied scenarios, and especially when few APs are available. In addition, all the considered ML algorithms perform pretty well. As a result, it is not necessary to use more complex solutions (e.g., SVM) when simpler ones (e.g., nearest neighbor classifiers) achieve similar results both in terms of accuracy and location error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.