Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36616863›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Improving Fingerprint-Based Positioning by Using IEEE 802.11mc FTM/RTT Observables.

Israel Martin-Escalona, Enrica Zola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Israel Martin-EscalonaNetwork Engineering Department, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3668-681X
Enrica ZolaNetwork Engineering Department, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6067-729X

Funding

European GNSS Agency (GSA) GSA/GRANT/04/2019/BANSHEEMCIN/AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033 PGC2018-099945-BI00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Received signal strength (RSS) has been one of the most used observables for location purposes due to its availability at almost every wireless device. However, the volatile nature of RSS tends to yield to non-reliable location solutions. IEEE 802.11mc enabled the use of the round trip time (RTT) for positioning, which is expected to be a more consistent observable for location purposes. This approach has been gaining support from several companies such as Google, which introduced that feature in the Android O.S. As a result, RTT estimation is now available in several recent off-the-shelf devices, opening a wide range of new approaches for computing location. However, RTT has been traditionally addressed to multilateration solutions. Few works exist that assess the feasibility of the RTT as an accurate feature in positioning methods based on classification algorithms. An attempt is made in this paper to fill this gap by investigating the performance of several classification models in terms of accuracy and positioning errors. The performance is assessed using different AP layouts, distinct AP vendors, and different frequency bands. The accuracy and precision of the RTT-based position estimation is always better than the one obtained with RSS in all the studied scenarios, and especially when few APs are available. In addition, all the considered ML algorithms perform pretty well. As a result, it is not necessary to use more complex solutions (e.g., SVM) when simpler ones (e.g., nearest neighbor classifiers) achieve similar results both in terms of accuracy and location error.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisfingerprintingIEEE 802.11mclocationmachine learningpositioningpositioning errorRSSRTTscalabilityunder-coverageWi-Fi

Identifiers

PMID36616863
PMCPMC9824134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.