Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36616823›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Emotion Detection Using Deep Normalized Attention-Based Neural Network and Modified-Random Forest.

Shtwai Alsubai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shtwai AlsubaiCollege of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6584-7400

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the contemporary world, emotion detection of humans is procuring huge scope in extensive dimensions such as bio-metric security, HCI (human-computer interaction), etc. Such emotions could be detected from various means, such as information integration from facial expressions, gestures, speech, etc. Though such physical depictions contribute to emotion detection, EEG (electroencephalogram) signals have gained significant focus in emotion detection due to their sensitivity to alterations in emotional states. Hence, such signals could explore significant emotional state features. However, manual detection from EEG signals is a time-consuming process. With the evolution of artificial intelligence, researchers have attempted to use different data mining algorithms for emotion detection from EEG signals. Nevertheless, they have shown ineffective accuracy. To resolve this, the present study proposes a DNA-RCNN (Deep Normalized Attention-based Residual Convolutional Neural Network) to extract the appropriate features based on the discriminative representation of features. The proposed NN also explores alluring features with the proposed attention modules leading to consistent performance. Finally, classification is performed by the proposed M-RF (modified-random forest) with an empirical loss function. In this process, the learning weights on the data subset alleviate loss amongst the predicted value and ground truth, which assists in precise classification. Performance and comparative analysis are considered to explore the better performance of the proposed system in detecting emotions from EEG signals that confirms its effectiveness.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRandom ForestAlgorithmsElectroencephalographyEmotionsHumansNeural Networks, Computerdeep normalized attention-based residual convolutional neural networkelectroencephalogramemotion detectionmodified-random forest

Identifiers

PMID36616823
PMCPMC9823734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.