ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Understanding How CNNs Recognize Facial Expressions: A Case Study with LIME and CEM.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contrastive explainable AI in healthcare: a systematic review of trends, benefits, research gaps, and future directions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- ADBrainNet: a deep neural network for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) classification using resting-state fMRI images based on explainable artificial intelligence.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Explainable Machine Learning for the Early Clinical Detection of Ovarian Cancer Using Contrastive Explanations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Research on Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Tourists' Landscape Perception and Emotional Experience by Using Photo Data Mining.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recognizing facial expressions has been a persistent goal in the scientific community. Since the rise of artificial intelligence, convolutional neural networks (CNN) have become popular to recognize facial expressions, as images can be directly used as input. Current CNN models can achieve high recognition rates, but they give no clue about their reasoning process. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has been developed as a means to help to interpret the results obtained by machine learning models. When dealing with images, one of the most-used XAI techniques is LIME. LIME highlights the areas of the image that contribute to a classification. As an alternative to LIME, the CEM method appeared, providing explanations in a way that is natural for human classification: besides highlighting what is sufficient to justify a classification, it also identifies what should be absent to maintain it and to distinguish it from another classification. This study presents the results of comparing LIME and CEM applied over complex images such as facial expression images. While CEM could be used to explain the results on images described with a reduced number of features, LIME would be the method of choice when dealing with images described with a huge number of features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.