ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
A 2D-GRAPPA Algorithm with a Boomerang Kernel for 3D MRI Data Accelerated along Two Phase-Encoding Directions.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For the reconstruction of 3D MRI data that are accelerated along the two phase-encoding directions, the 2D-generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) algorithm can be used to estimate the missing data in the k-space. We propose a new boomerang-shaped kernel based on theoretic and systemic analyses of the shape and dimensions of the kernel. The reconstruction efficiency of the 2D-GRAPPA algorithm with the proposed boomerang-shaped kernel (i.e., boomerang kernel (BK)-2D-GRAPPA) was compared with other 2D-GRAPPA algorithms that utilize different types of kernels (i.e., EX-2D-GRAPPA and SK-2D-GRAPPA) based on computer simulation, phantom and in vivo experiments. The proposed method was validated for different sets of ACS lines with acceleration factors from four to eight and various sizes of the kernels. A quantitative analysis was also performed by comparing the normalized root mean squared error (nRMSE) in the images and the undersampled edges. Computer simulation, in vivo and phantom experiments, and the quantitative analysis, showed that the proposed method could reduce aliasing artifacts without reducing the SNRs of the reconstructed images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.