ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Estimating Ground Reaction Forces from Two-Dimensional Pose Data: A Biomechanics-Based Comparison of AlphaPose, BlazePose, and OpenPose.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wireless knee joint monitoring using biodegradable single-ended pressure sensor in osteoarthritis management.Science advances · 2026Article
- The Use of Machine Learning to Estimate Ground Reaction Forces During Running: A Scoping Review of the Current Practices.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Estimation of Knee Joint Mechanics from Kinematic and Neuromuscular Inputs: A Proof-of-Concept Using the CAMS-Knee Datasets.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating Assistive Technology Outcomes in Boccia Athletes with Disabilities Using AI-Based Kinematic Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Use of Technologies for the Acquisition and Processing Strategies for Motion Data Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Influence of the Camera Viewing Angle on OpenPose Validity in Motion Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Commercial vision sensors and AI-based pose estimation frameworks for markerless motion analysis in sports and exercises: a mini review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Synchronised Video, Motion Capture and Force Plate Dataset for Validating Markerless Human Movement Analysis.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Validation of Automated Countermovement Vertical Jump Analysis: Markerless Pose Estimation vs. 3D Marker-Based Motion Capture System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Biomechanical Gait Analysis Using a Smartphone-Based Motion Capture System (OpenCap) in Patients with Neurological Disorders.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Force during Single-leg Landing Using Two-dimensional Video Images and Pose Estimation Artificial Intelligence.Physical therapy research · 2024Article
- Regression-Based Camera Pose Estimation through Multi-Level Local Features and Global Features.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The adoption of computer vision pose estimation approaches, used to identify keypoint locations which are intended to reflect the necessary anatomical landmarks relied upon by biomechanists for musculoskeletal modelling, has gained increasing traction in recent years. This uptake has been further accelerated by keypoint use as inputs into machine learning models used to estimate biomechanical parameters such as ground reaction forces (GRFs) in the absence of instrumentation required for direct measurement. This study first aimed to investigate the keypoint detection rate of three open-source pose estimation models (AlphaPose, BlazePose, and OpenPose) across varying movements, camera views, and trial lengths. Second, this study aimed to assess the suitability and interchangeability of keypoints detected by each pose estimation model when used as inputs into machine learning models for the estimation of GRFs. The keypoint detection rate of BlazePose was distinctly lower than that of AlphaPose and OpenPose. All pose estimation models achieved a high keypoint detection rate at the centre of an image frame and a lower detection rate in the true sagittal plane camera field of view, compared with slightly anteriorly or posteriorly located quasi-sagittal plane camera views. The three-dimensional ground reaction force, instantaneous loading rate, and peak force for running could be estimated using the keypoints of all three pose estimation models. However, only AlphaPose and OpenPose keypoints could be used interchangeably with a machine learning model trained to estimate GRFs based on AlphaPose keypoints resulting in a high estimation accuracy when OpenPose keypoints were used as inputs and vice versa. The findings of this study highlight the need for further evaluation of computer vision-based pose estimation models for application in biomechanical human modelling, and the limitations of machine learning-based GRF estimation models that rely on 2D keypoints. This is of particular relevance given that machine learning models informing athlete monitoring guidelines are being developed for application related to athlete well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.