ArticlePolymers2023
Elasto-Plastic Mechanical Modeling of Fused Deposition 3D Printing Materials.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The Influence of Certain Operating Conditions of the FDM Process on the Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Materials-A Review.Polymers · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- Three-dimensional printing in modern orthopedic trauma surgery: a comprehensive analysis of technical evolution and clinical translation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Effect of 3D Printing Process Parameters and Heat Treatment Conditions on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of PEEK Parts.Polymers · 2023Article
- A Mechanical Performance Study of Dual Cured Thermoset Resin Systems 3D-Printed with Continuous Carbon Fiber Reinforcement.Polymers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is one of the most common 3D printing technologies and is becoming a well-established production method. Short fiber-reinforced polymers represent a new class of printing materials that enhance the mechanical properties of final components, thus informing an interesting subject of analysis for this study. FDM-printed parts are characterized by a strong anisotropy, so their behavior should be analyzed accordingly. The authors proposed a modeling strategy based on a transversely isotropic behavior hypothesis, representing material behaviors associated with an elasticity matrix in relation to the elastic field and a combination of Hill's yield criterion and Voce's isotropic hardening law for the plastic field. Material properties of materials were experimentally identified through tensile tests on dog bone specimens printed with different orientations in space. The numerical model was then calibrated using the finite element software LS-DYNA and the optimization software LS-OPT. An agreement between numerical and experimental results showed the robustness of the modeling strategy proposed to describe the stress behaviors of printed materials until a maximum load is reached, while strain behaviors have yet to be correctly defined due to the difficulties associated with evaluating an equivalent deformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.