Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36616420›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Catalytic Pyrolysis of PET Polymer Using Nonisothermal Thermogravimetric Analysis Data: Kinetics and Artificial Neural Networks Studies.

Ibrahim Dubdub, Zaid Alhulaybi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ibrahim DubdubDepartment of Chemical Engineering, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2773-865X
Zaid AlhulaybiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

King Faisal University GRANT964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents the catalytic pyrolysis of a constant-composition mixture of zeolite β and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) polymer by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) at different heating rates (2, 5, 10, and 20 K/min). The thermograms showed only one main reaction and shifted to higher temperatures with increasing heating rate. In addition, at constant heating rate, they moved to lower temperatures of pure PET pyrolysis when a catalyst was added. Four isoconversional models, namely, Kissinger−Akahira−Sunose (KAS), Friedman, Flynn−Wall−Qzawa (FWO), and Starink, were applied to obtain the activation energy (Ea). Values of Ea acquired by these models were very close to each other with average value of Ea = 154.0 kJ/mol, which was much lower than that for pure PET pyrolysis. The Coats−Redfern and Criado methods were employed to set the most convenient solid-state reaction mechanism. These methods revealed that the experimental data matched those obtained by different mechanisms depending on the heating rate. Values of Ea obtained by these two models were within the average values of 157 kJ/mol. An artificial neural network (ANN) was utilized to predict the remaining weight fraction using two input variables (temperature and heating rate). The results proved that ANN could predict the experimental value very efficiently (R2 > 0.999) even with new data.

Indexed as

ANNcatalytic pyrolysiskineticsPETTGAzeolite β

Identifiers

PMID36616420
PMCPMC9824759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.