ReviewPolymers2022
Fused Deposition Modelling of Polymer Composite: A Progress.
Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models for Optimal Prediction of Printed-Line Features in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of In Situ Preheating Technology on Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of FFF-Printed PEEK.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Multi criteria optimization of FDM process parameters for NylonAF80 filaments using CRITIC CoCoSo and machine learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fused Deposition Modeling of Polymer Composites: Development, Properties and Applications.Polymers · 2025Review
- Layer combination of similar infill patterns on the tensile and compression behavior of 3D printed PLA.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Future of Medicine: How 3D Printing Is Transforming Pharmaceuticals.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Preparation and Properties of PETG Filament Modified with a Metallic Additive.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Interpenetrating Composites: A Nomenclature Dilemma.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nanomaterials Reinforced Polymer Filament for Fused Deposition Modeling: A State-of-the-Art Review.Polymers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) highlights developing complex and efficient parts for various uses. Fused deposition modelling (FDM) is the most frequent fabrication procedure used to make polymer products. Although it is widely used, due to its low characteristics, such as weak mechanical properties and poor surface, the types of polymer material that may be produced are limited, affecting the structural applications of FDM. Therefore, the FDM process utilises the polymer composition to produce a better physical product. The review's objective is to systematically document all critical information on FDMed-polymer composite processing, specifically for part fabrication. The review covers the published works on the FDMed-polymer composite from 2011 to 2021 based on our systematic literature review of more than 150 high-impact related research articles. The base and filler material used, and the process parameters including layer height, nozzle temperature, bed temperature, and screw type are also discussed in this review. FDM is utilised in various biomedical, automotive, and other manufacturing industries. This study is expected to be one of the essential pit-stops for future related works in the FDMed-polymeric composite study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.