Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36615899›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Interventions for Picky Eaters among Typically Developed Children-A Scoping Review.

Mohd Shah Kamarudin, Mohd Razif Shahril, Hasnah Haron, Masne Kadar, Nik Shanita Safii, Nur Hana Hamzaid

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nature and nurture in fussy eating from toddlerhood to early adolescence: findings from the Gemini twin cohort.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohd Shah KamarudinCenter for Rehabilitation & Special Needs Studies (iCaRehab), Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Mohd Razif ShahrilCenter for Healthy Ageing & Wellness (H-CARE), Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8680-3087
Hasnah HaronCenter for Healthy Ageing & Wellness (H-CARE), Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Masne KadarCenter for Rehabilitation & Special Needs Studies (iCaRehab), Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-1497-0548
Nik Shanita SafiiCenter for Community Health Studies (ReaCH), Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0789-1486
Nur Hana HamzaidCenter for Rehabilitation & Special Needs Studies (iCaRehab), Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5414-446X
National University of Malaysia · MY

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education FRGS/1/2021/SKK06/UKM/03/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Picky eating in children is often a major source of concern for many parents and caregivers. Picky eaters (PEs) consume limited foods, demonstrate food aversion, and have a limited food repertoire, which hinders their growth and health. These behaviours are common in children with special health care needs despite the rise in typically developing children. This leads to less attention being given to intervention programmes for typically developing children. Therefore, this scoping review aims to investigate the key concept of an existing intervention programme for PE among typically developing children, primarily on the types and approaches selected. A thorough literature search was conducted on three primary databases (PubMed, Emerald In-sight, and Web of Science) using predefined keywords. The literature was then appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidelines and protocols, and the PRISMScR checklist. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were also specified in the screening procedure. Results showed that the majority of the interventions in these studies were single-component interventions, with the sensory approach being the type that was most frequently utilised, followed by the nutrition approach and parenting approach. Single and multiple intervention components improved the assessed outcome, with a note that other components may or may not show a similar outcome, as they were not assessed in the single-component intervention. Given the evidence that picky eating is influenced by various factors, a multi-component intervention can provide a substantial impact on future programmes. In addition, defining picky eaters using standardised tools is also essential for a more inclusive subject selection.

Indexed as

Food PreferencesNutritional StatusChildDiet FadsFeeding BehaviorHumansParentingParentseating behaviourinterventionnutritionparentingpicky eaterssensory

Identifiers

PMID36615899
PMCPMC9824123
OpenAlexW4313578607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.