Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36615871›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Five U.S. Dietary Patterns and Their Relationship to Land Use, Water Use, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Implications for Future Food Security.

Rose Jennings, Andrew D Henderson, Alexis Phelps, Kathryn M Janda, Alexandra E van den Berg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rose JenningsMichael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, UTHealth Houston School of Public Health Austin Campus, Austin, TX 77030, USA.
Andrew D HendersonMichael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, UTHealth Houston School of Public Health Austin Campus, Austin, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2436-7512
Alexis PhelpsMichael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, UTHealth Houston School of Public Health Austin Campus, Austin, TX 77030, USA.
Kathryn M JandaMichael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, UTHealth Houston School of Public Health Austin Campus, Austin, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2121-553X
Alexandra E van den BergMichael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, UTHealth Houston School of Public Health Austin Campus, Austin, TX 77030, USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USBaylor University · USEastern Research Group (United States) · US

Funding

Cancer Prevention and Control Research Training and Career Development ProgramT32CA057712 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Bijal A. Balasubramanian, Maria Eulalia Fernandez · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. agri-food system is a driver of climate change and other impacts. In order to achieve environmental targets that limit global mean temperature rise ≤2 °C, a shift in American dietary patterns is critical. The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to determine the environmental impact (i.e., land use, water use, and GHG emissions) related to consumption of five U.S. dietary patterns (i.e., Current U.S., the Healthy U.S., Mediterranean, Healthy Vegetarian, and Vegan), and (2) to determine the specific impact of each food group in each dietary pattern on the three environmental indicators. This study utilized existing datasets to synthesize information related to the study's environmental indicators and food production and connected these data to the current U.S. diet and the USDA-defined diets. Results indicate that the three omnivore diets contributed the greatest to GHG emissions, land use and water use. The Vegan diet scored the lowest across all indicators, although the water required for plant-based protein nearly offset other water gains. For the omnivore diets, red meat and dairy milk contributed the most to each environmental indicator. By considering sustainability as well as health outcomes in their recommendations in the Dietary Guidelines, the USDA can have a critical role in shifting diets necessary to alter climate change trends.

Indexed as

Greenhouse GasesDietEnvironmentFood SecurityWaterGreenhouse GasesWaterclimate changedietary guidelinesdietary patternsgreenhouse gas emissionsland usewater use

Identifiers

PMID36615871
PMCPMC9823774
OpenAlexW4313473046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.