Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36615848›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Development of the Italian Clinical Practice Guidelines on Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Design and Methodological Aspects.

Maurizio De Luca, Marco Antonio Zappa, Monica Zese, Ugo Bardi, Maria Grazia Carbonelli, Francesco Maria Carrano, Giovanni Casella, Marco Chianelli, Sonja Chiappetta, Angelo Iossa and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Maurizio De LucaRovigo Hospital, 45030 Rovigo, Italy.
Marco Antonio ZappaASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Monica ZeseRovigo Hospital, 45030 Rovigo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4768-6746
Ugo BardiCasa di Cura Privata Salus, 84091 Salerno, Italy.
Maria Grazia CarbonelliA.O. San Camillo Forlanini, 00152 Rome, Italy.
Francesco Maria CarranoMinimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgery, Università Degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", 00173 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1189-9907
Giovanni CasellaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1535-7198
Marco ChianelliOspedale Regina Apostolorum Roma, 00041 Rome, Italy.
Sonja ChiappettaOspedale Evangelico Betania Napoli, 80147 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1964-416X
Angelo IossaSapienza Polo Pontino Dipartimento di Scienze Biotecnologie Medico Chirurgiche, 04100 Latina, Italy.
Alessandro MartininoDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4016-534X
Fausta MicantiUniversità Federico II Napoli, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe NavarraPoliclinico Universitario "G. Martino" Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy.
Giacomo PiattoOspedale di Montebelluna, 31044 Montebelluna, Italy.
Marco RaffaelliFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Roma, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1259-2491
Eugenia RomanoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
Simone RugolottoRovigo Hospital, 45030 Rovigo, Italy.
Roberto SerraPoliclinico Casa di Cura Abano Terme, 35031 Abano Terme, Italy.
Emanuele SoricelliOspedale Santa Maria Nuova Firenze, 50122 Florence, Italy.
Antonio VitielloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Di Napoli "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1514-7112
Luigi SchiavoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Baronissi, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.
Iris Caterina Maria ZaniAmici Obesi ONLUS Milano, 20128 Milan, Italy.
Giulia BandiniDiabetes Agency, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi and University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Edoardo MannucciDiabetes Agency, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi and University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Benedetta RagghiantiDiabetes Agency, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi and University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Matteo MonamiDiabetes Agency, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi and University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9349-828X
Panel and Evidence Review Team for the Italian Guidelines on Surgical Treatment of Obesity

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of the Italian clinical practice guidelines on bariatric and metabolic surgery, as well as design and methodological aspects.

backgroundObesity and its complications are a growing problem in many countries. Italian Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery for Obesity (Società Italiana di Chirurgia dell'Obesità e delle Malattie Metaboliche-SICOB) developed the first Italian guidelines for the treatment of obesity.

methodsThe creation of SICOB Guidelines is based on an extended work made by a panel of 24 members and a coordinator. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology has been used to decide the aims, reference population, and target health professionals. Clinical questions have been created using the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) conceptual framework. The definition of questions used the two-step web-based Delphi method, made by repeated rounds of questionnaires and a consensus opinion from the panel.

resultsThe panel proposed 37 questions. A consensus was immediately reached for 33 (89.2%), with 31 approved, two rejected and three which did not reach an immediate consensus. The further discussion allowed a consensus with one approved and two rejected.

conclusionsThe areas covered by the clinical questions included indications of metabolic/bariatric surgery, types of surgery, and surgical management. The choice of a surgical or a non-surgical approach has been debated for the determination of the therapeutic strategy and the correct indications.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryHumansObesityPractice Guidelines as Topicarterial hypertension (AHI)dyslipidemia (DL)gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)guidelinesmetabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS)obesityobstructive sleep apnea (OSA)type 2 diabetes (T2D)

Identifiers

PMID36615848
PMCPMC9823862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.