Observational studyNutrients2022
Low-Dose Oral Iron Replacement Therapy Is Effective for Many Japanese Hemodialysis Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of inflammatory status on intestinal iron absorption in older hospitalized patients.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Article
- High Ferritin Is Not Needed in Hemodialysis Patients: A Retrospective Study of Total Body Iron and Oral Iron Replacement Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Deferiprone and Iron-Maltol: Forty Years since Their Discovery and Insights into Their Drug Design, Development, Clinical Use and Future Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Western guidelines recommend the use of intravenous iron supplementation for hemodialysis patients. However, in Japanese patients with well-controlled inflammation, iron replacement may be achieved with oral iron supplementation. This study involved 108 courses in 77 outpatient hemodialysis patients who received low-dose oral iron replacement therapy. Data from baseline to week 28 of treatment were analyzed to identify factors associated with effectiveness. Changes over time in erythrocyte- and iron-related parameters and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) dose were investigated in the effective group. A total of 84 courses (77.8%) satisfied the effectiveness criteria. Compared with the effective and ineffective groups, only C-reactive protein (CRP) was significantly different (p < 0.01). ROC curve analysis with efficacy as the endpoint showed a CRP cut point value of ≤0.1 mg/dL (area under the curve, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.57−0.81). The relationship between serum ferritin and hemoglobin fluctuation by reducing the ESA dose showed a positive correlation (p < 0.001). In the ESA maintenance group, the serum ferritin gradually increased and then remained constant at about 60 ng/mL. Our data suggest that patients with CRP ≤ 0.1 mg/dL may benefit from low doses of oral iron supplementation. Approximately 60 ng/mL serum ferritin may be sufficient during stable hematopoiesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.