Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36615731›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

Reliability of Self-Reported Height and Weight in Children: A School-Based Cross-Sectional Study and a Review.

Magali Rios-Leyvraz, Natalia Ortega, Arnaud Chiolero

Open access · goldAbstract readReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Self-report of body silhouettes to discriminate high abdominal adiposity in adolescents].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Magali Rios-LeyvrazPopulation Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-197X
Natalia OrtegaPopulation Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Arnaud ChioleroPopulation Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5544-8510
University of Bern · CHUniversity of Fribourg · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 109999Swiss National Science Foundation 204967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since anthropometric measurements are not always feasible in large surveys, self-reported values are an alternative. Our objective was to assess the reliability of self-reported weight and height values compared to measured values in children with (1) a cross-sectional study in Switzerland and (2) a comprehensive review with a meta-analysis. We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a school-based study in Switzerland of 2616 children and a review of 63 published studies including 122,629 children. In the cross-sectional study, self-reported and measured values were highly correlated (weight:

Indexed as

Body HeightThinnessBody Mass IndexBody WeightChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsSelf Reportbody mass indexchildrenheightreviewSwitzerlandweight

Identifiers

PMID36615731
PMCPMC9824624
OpenAlexW4313414019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.