ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Prosthesis Tailoring for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simple Index for Identifying Patients at Increased Risk of Suboptimal Forward-Flow Hemodynamics After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Observational
- Molecular Mechanisms of Cardiac Adaptation After Device Deployment.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- How to avoid transcatheter aortic valve replacement explant as the second valve procedure: image assessment for the index transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
- Transcatheter Heart Valves with Labelling for Aortic Regurgitation.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Overcoming prosthesis-patient mismatch with transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Review
- Utility of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Based on Published Data from 7458 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical considerations and challenges in TAV-in-TAV procedures.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the VenusA-Pro and VenusA-Plus systems: preliminary experience in China.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has risen over the past 20 years as a safe and effective alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis, and is now a well-established and recommended treatment option in suitable patients irrespective of predicted risk of mortality after surgery. Studies of numerous devices, either newly developed or reiterations of previous prostheses, have been accruing. We hereby review TAVI devices, with a focus on commercially available options, and aim to present a guide for prosthesis tailoring according to patient-related anatomical and clinical factors that may favor particular designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.