Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36615138›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Nomograms Combining PHI and PI-RADS in Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

Yongheng Zhou, Qiang Fu, Zhiqiang Shao, Keqin Zhang, Wenqiang Qi, Shangzhen Geng, Wenfu Wang, Jianfeng Cui, Xin Jiang, Rongyang Li and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yongheng ZhouDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Qiang FuDepartment of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan 250000, China.
Zhiqiang ShaoDepartment of Urology, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi 276000, China.
Keqin ZhangDepartment of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan 250000, China.
Wenqiang QiDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Shangzhen GengDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Wenfu WangDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Jianfeng CuiDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Xin JiangDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Rongyang LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6047-3027
Yaofeng ZhuDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Shouzhen ChenDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Benkang ShiDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CNLinyi People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The study aimed to construct nomograms to improve the detection rates of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) in the Asian population. (2) Methods: This multicenter prospective study included a group of 293 patients from three hospitals. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential risk factors and construct nomograms. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were used to assess the performance of the nomogram. The web-based dynamic nomograms were subsequently built based on multivariable logistic analysis. (3) Results: A total of 293 patients were included in our study with 201 negative and 92 positive results in PCa. Four independent predictive factors (age, prostate health index (PHI), prostate volume, and prostate imaging reporting and data system score (PI-RADS)) for PCa were included, and four factors (age, PHI, PI-RADS, and Log PSA Density) for CSPCa were included. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for PCa was 0.902 in the training cohort and 0.869 in the validation cohort. The AUC for CSPCa was 0.896 in the training cohort and 0.890 in the validation cohort. (4) Conclusions: The combined diagnosis of PHI and PI-RADS can avoid more unnecessary biopsies and improve the detection rate of PCa and CSPCa. The nomogram with the combination of age, PHI, PV, and PI-RADS could improve the detection of PCa, and the nomogram with the combination of age, PHI, PI-RADS, and Log PSAD could improve the detection of CSPCa.

Indexed as

diagnosismultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingnomogramprostate cancerprostate health index

Identifiers

PMID36615138
PMCPMC9821430
OpenAlexW4313472624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.