ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
HRT in Women Undergoing Pelvic Clearance for Endometriosis-A Case Report and a National Survey.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding Peritoneal Fluid Estrogen and Progesterone Concentrations Permits Individualization of Medical Treatment of Endometriosis-Associated Pain with Lower Doses, Especially in Adolescents Not Requiring Contraception.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Management of menopause in women with a history of endometriosis.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in women who have undergone pelvic clearance for endometriosis remains uncertain with insufficient evidence. The purpose of this case report and the national survey was to highlight the potential HRT-related risks and to establish current HRT practice in this group of women. The case was a 45-year-old woman presenting with recurrence of severe chronic pelvic pain while on oestrogen-only HRT (EO-HRT) for five years after subtotal hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy for severe endometriosis. MRI revealed multiple peri-cervical endometriomas and severe right hydroureter/hydronephrosis with complete right renal parenchymal loss. The survey was a 21-item questionnaire administered electronically using SurveyMonkey. It was reviewed and approved by British Menopause Society and British Society of Gynaecological endoscopy and was sent to their members as well as NHS Gynaecologists. A total of 216 physicians responded including 120 (55.6%) Gynaecology Consultants and 96 (44.4%) GPs/Nurses in Menopause clinics. Overall, 68.6% of responders prescribe combined HRT (C-HRT), 11.1% tibolone, 13.0% EO-HRT and 7.8% varied HRT. Fifty-one percent prescribe the progestogen component of C-HRT indefinitely, 22% for 3-6 months and 27% for varied durations. In conclusion, this study highlights the real risk of endometriosis recurrence in EO-HRT users after pelvic clearance for endometriosis. The survey revealed that only two thirds of Gynecologists/Menopause practitioners prescribe combined HRT in this group of women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.