Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36615101›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Single-Session Impact of High-Power Laser with Moses Technology for Lower Pole Stones in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Retrospective Study.

Takaaki Inoue, Shuzo Hamamoto, Shinsuke Okada, Fukashi Yamamichi, Masaichiro Fujita, Koki Tominaga, Yasumasa Tobe, Masato Fujisawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Measuring health-related quality of life in sepsis survivors and caregivers: a mapping review and a preliminary conceptual framework.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Predictive factors for prolonged operative time in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones A retrospective cohort study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takaaki InoueDepartment of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, 5-7-17 Kitanagasadori, Kobe 650-0012, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6050-5452
Shuzo HamamotoDepartment of Urology, Medical School, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan.
Shinsuke OkadaDepartment of Urology, Gyotoku General Hospital, Ichikawa 272-0103, Japan.
Fukashi YamamichiDepartment of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, 5-7-17 Kitanagasadori, Kobe 650-0012, Japan.
Masaichiro FujitaDepartment of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, 5-7-17 Kitanagasadori, Kobe 650-0012, Japan.
Koki TominagaDepartment of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, 5-7-17 Kitanagasadori, Kobe 650-0012, Japan.
Yasumasa TobeDepartment of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, 5-7-17 Kitanagasadori, Kobe 650-0012, Japan.
Masato FujisawaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe 650-0017, Japan.
Kobe University · JPEiju General Hospital · JPNagoya City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

flexible ureteroscopylower pole stoneMoses technologyretrograde intrarenal surgery

Identifiers

PMID36615101
PMCPMC9821691
OpenAlexW4313392201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.