Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36615003›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Reliability of Endolymphatic Hydrops Qualitative Assessment in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Emilia Wnuk, Magdalena Lachowska, Agnieszka Jasińska-Nowacka, Edyta Maj, Kazimierz Niemczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Magnetic resonance imaging research progress of hydropic ear disease].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emilia Wnuk2nd Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0863-748X
Magdalena LachowskaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3631-2551
Agnieszka Jasińska-NowackaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Edyta Maj2nd Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Kazimierz NiemczykDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to compare the consistency of MRI interpretation of endolymphatic hydrops qualitative assessment of inner ear structures performed by independent observers. MRI with a delayed post-contrast 3D-FLAIR sequence was performed to visualize EH in patients suspected of having or diagnosed with MD. The scans were analyzed independently by three observers. In total, 220 ears were evaluated and, of these, 75 had definite MD, five probable MD, 67 with other Menieriform symptoms, and 73 were asymptomatic. Significant differences in cochlear endolymphatic hydrops (CoEH) grading between all observers were observed. On the Barath scale of vestibular endolymphatic hydrops (VEH), differences were found between the radiologists and otorhinolaryngologist in grading. No differences were noted in VEH on the Bernaerts scale and increased perilymphatic enhancement. Our study showed that evaluation of vestibular endolymphatic hydrops is repeatable between observers and easy to learn. It proved that Bernaerts' modification increased the sensitivity of EH diagnosis. Both parameters, CoEH and VEH, may serve as a differentiation method of EH from normal ears. The distinction between normal and hydropic ears is much easier to perform than EH grading. Therefore, it may be used to diagnose MD rather than EH staging.

Indexed as

3D-FLAIRendolymphatic hydropsinner earmagnetic resonance imagingMénière’s diseasevertigo

Identifiers

PMID36615003
PMCPMC9821015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.