Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36614984›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Deep Learning with a Dataset Created Using Kanno Saitama Macro, a Self-Made Automatic Foveal Avascular Zone Extraction Program.

Junji Kanno, Takuhei Shoji, Hirokazu Ishii, Hisashi Ibuki, Yuji Yoshikawa, Takanori Sasaki, Kei Shinoda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distal junctional failure in posterior cervical and cervicothoracic fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of associated factors.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Junji KannoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical University School of Medicine, Iruma 350-0495, Japan.
Takuhei ShojiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical University School of Medicine, Iruma 350-0495, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5464-2573
Hirokazu IshiiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical University School of Medicine, Iruma 350-0495, Japan.
Hisashi IbukiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical University School of Medicine, Iruma 350-0495, Japan.
Yuji YoshikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical University School of Medicine, Iruma 350-0495, Japan.
Takanori SasakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical University School of Medicine, Iruma 350-0495, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6586-1176
Kei ShinodaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saitama Medical University School of Medicine, Iruma 350-0495, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1543-9345
Saitama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extraction of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) from optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images has been used in many studies in recent years due to its association with various ophthalmic diseases. In this study, we investigated the utility of a dataset for deep learning created using Kanno Saitama Macro (KSM), a program that automatically extracts the FAZ using swept-source OCTA. The test data included 40 eyes of 20 healthy volunteers. For training and validation, we used 257 eyes from 257 patients. The FAZ of the retinal surface image was extracted using KSM, and a dataset for FAZ extraction was created. Based on that dataset, we conducted a training test using a typical U-Net. Two examiners manually extracted the FAZ of the test data, and the results were used as gold standards to compare the Jaccard coefficients between examiners, and between each examiner and the U-Net. The Jaccard coefficient was 0.931 between examiner 1 and examiner 2, 0.951 between examiner 1 and the U-Net, and 0.933 between examiner 2 and the U-Net. The Jaccard coefficients were significantly better between examiner 1 and the U-Net than between examiner 1 and examiner 2 (p < 0.001). These data indicated that the dataset generated by KSM was as good as, if not better than, the agreement between examiners using the manual method. KSM may contribute to reducing the burden of annotation in deep learning.

Indexed as

annotationautomatic extractionfoveal avascular zonemanually extractU-Net

Identifiers

PMID36614984
PMCPMC9821090
OpenAlexW4313245537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.