ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Application of Logistic Regression and Artificial Intelligence in the Risk Prediction of Acute Aortic Dissection Rupture.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- An LLM-enhanced AI agent for rapid diagnosis of acute aortic dissection in multi-center settings.iScience · 2026Article
- Convolutional neural networks using preoperative CT to predict short-term recurrence after incisional hernia repair.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a computed tomography angiography‑based prediction model for acute rupture in type A aortic dissection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Machine learning models for predicting postoperative paraplegia in acute type A aortic dissection patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Machine learning approaches for risk prediction in aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Research on a machine learning-based predictive model for postoperative neurological dysfunction in acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Acute type A aortic dissection rupture factors prediction using a hybrid ensemble model with feature selection and data augmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence as a Prognostic Tool in the Management of Acute Aortic Syndrome and Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A Deep Learning Model for Identifying the Risk of Mesenteric Malperfusion in Acute Aortic Dissection Using Initial Diagnostic Data: Algorithm Development and Validation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Surgery: Transforming Outcomes and Shaping the Future.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Lactylation of Mitochondrial Adenosine Triphosphate Synthase Subunit Alpha Regulates Vascular Remodeling and Progression of Aortic Dissection.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Salp swarm-optimized machine learning models for predicting preoperative aortic rupture risk in acute type a aortic dissection patients.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Investigation of Relationship between Hemodynamic and Morphometric Characteristics of Aortas in Pediatric Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Inducing aortic aneurysm/dissection in zebrafish: evaluating the efficacy of β-Aminopropionic Nitrile as a model.Animal cells and systems · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Logistic regression (LR) and artificial intelligence algorithms were used to analyze the risk factors for the early rupture of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Data from electronic medical records of 200 patients diagnosed with ATAAD from the Department of Emergency of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital from April 2012 to March 2017 were collected. Logistic regression and artificial intelligence algorithms were used to establish prediction models, and the prediction effects of four models were analyzed. According to the LR models, we elucidated independent risk factors for ATAAD rupture, which included age > 63 years (odds ratio (OR) = 1.69), female sex (OR = 1.77), ventilator assisted ventilation (OR = 3.05), AST > 80 U/L (OR = 1.59), no distortion of the inner membrane (OR = 1.57), the diameter of the aortic sinus > 41 mm (OR = 0.92), maximum aortic diameter > 48 mm (OR = 1.32), the ratio of false lumen area to true lumen area > 2.12 (OR = 1.94), lactates > 1.9 mmol/L (OR = 2.28), and white blood cell > 14.2 × 109 /L (OR = 1.23). The highest sensitivity and accuracy were found with the convolutional neural network (CNN) model. Its sensitivity was 0.93, specificity was 0.90, and accuracy was 0.90. In this present study, we found that age, sex, select biomarkers, and select morphological parameters of the aorta are independent predictors for the rupture of ATAAD. In terms of predicting the risk of ATAAD, the performance of random forests and CNN is significantly better than LR, but the performance of the support vector machine (SVM) is worse than LR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.