ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022
Vertebral Fractures in Acromegaly: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences between bone health parameters in adults with acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency: A systematic review.Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism · 2023Pooled it
- Proteomic profile of bone in patients with acromegaly: new insights from a pilot exploratory study.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Bone and joint quality remains impaired in long-term controlled acromegaly: an HR-pQCT study.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Osteometabolic complications in patients with secreting pituitary adenomas: Is there an impact of gender?Pituitary · 2026Review
- Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound parameters strongly correlate with DXA measurements in patients with acromegaly.Pituitary · 2026Observational
- Exercise ventilatory inefficiency may be a specific feature of patients with acromegaly.Pituitary · 2025Article
- Evaluation of bone density and microstructure by DXA, TBS and HR-pQCT: an assessment of cortical porosity and its association with vertebral fractures in patients with acromegaly.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2025Article
- Hyperostosis frontalis interna and association of disease control with frontal bone thickness in acromegaly.BMC endocrine disorders · 2025Article
- Review
- New insights into the vitamin D/PTH axis in endocrine-driven metabolic bone diseases.Endocrine · 2024Review
- Acromegaly and Bone: An Update.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Review
- Skeletal complications in acromegaly.Reumatologia · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcromegaly is characterized by a very particular alteration of bone microarchitecture, leading to increased vertebral fragility. However, due to inconsistent and insufficient evidence, no guidelines are available for the evaluation of this osteopathy.
methodsWe performed a literature review of studies published between 1968 and January 2022 on the PubMed and SCOPUS databases using the terms "acromegaly" and "vertebral fractures". Twenty-four studies were found eligible for inclusion, published between June 2005 and November 2021. Included studies evaluated acromegaly patients, who were assessed for the presence of vertebral fractures. We excluded case reports, reviews, meta-analyses, letters to the editor, articles not written in English, and research performed on the same set of patients without significant differences in study design. Risk of bias was avoided by following the ROBIS risk of bias recommendations. We executed rigorous data collection, and the results are depicted as a narrative overview, but also, as statistical synthesis. Limitations of the evidence presented in the study include study heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and a small number of prospective studies with short follow-up.
findingsData regarding vertebral fractures (VFs) in acromegaly and their influencing factors are variable. Twenty-four studies were included, nine out of which had a prospective design. The smallest group of acromegaly patients had 18 subjects and the largest included 248 patients. Prevalence ranges between 6.5% and 87.1%, although most studies agree that it is significantly higher than in controls. VFs also have a higher incidence (between 5.6% and 42%) and are more frequently multiple (between 46.15% and 71%). Evidence shows that disease activity and active disease duration are influencing factors for the prevalence and incidence of VFs. Nonetheless, hypogonadism does not seem to influence the frequency of VFs. While reports are conflicting regarding the use of bone mineral density in acromegaly, evidence seems to be slightly in favor of it not being associated with VFs. However, trabecular bone score is significantly lower in fractured patients, although no prospective studies are available.
interpretationVertebral fractures evaluation should be performed with regularity in all acromegalic patients, especially in the presence of active disease. Disease activity is an important determinant of vertebral fracture incidence and prevalence, although hypogonadism is less so. To clarify the predictive value of both BMD and TBS for vertebral fractures, additional, larger, prospective studies are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.