Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36614955›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Multimodality Imaging Approach to Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.

Gemma Marrazzo, Stefano Palermi, Fabio Pastore, Massimo Ragni, Mariarosaria De Luca, Michele Gambardella, Gaetano Quaranta, Giancarlo Messalli, Lucia Riegler, Valeria Pergola and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Recurrent spontaneous coronary artery dissection with ST-segment elevation: once RCA involvement then left main/LAD-case report.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gemma MarrazzoDepartment of Cardiology, Umberto I° Hospital, 84014 Salerno, Italy.
Stefano PalermiPublic Health Department, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Fabio PastoreDepartment of Cardiology, Umberto I° Hospital, 84014 Salerno, Italy.
Massimo RagniDepartment of Cardiology, Umberto I° Hospital, 84014 Salerno, Italy.
Mariarosaria De LucaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6727-5725
Michele GambardellaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Gaetano QuarantaDepartment of Cardiology, Umberto I° Hospital, 84014 Salerno, Italy.
Giancarlo MessalliDepartment of Radiology, "Villa Malta" Hospital, 84087 Salerno, Italy.
Lucia RieglerDepartment of Cardiology, Umberto I° Hospital, 84014 Salerno, Italy.
Valeria PergolaDepartment of Cardiology, Padua University Hospital, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3317-7342
Andrea MantoDepartment of Neuroradiology, Umberto I° Hospital, 84014 Salerno, Italy.
Antonello D'AndreaDepartment of Cardiology, Umberto I° Hospital, 84014 Salerno, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9698-9145
Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) refers to the spontaneous separation of the layers of the vessel wall caused by intramural hemorrhage, with or without an intimal tear. The "typical" SCAD patient is a middle-aged woman with few traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and it's frequently associated with pregnancy. Because of its low incidence, its pathophysiology is not fully understood. SCAD presents as an acute coronary syndrome, with chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, or heartbeat, even if diagnosis and clinical handling are different: coronary angiography is currently the main tool to diagnose SCAD; however, in doubtful cases, the use of both invasive and noninvasive cardiovascular imaging methods such as intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography may be necessary. This paper aims to review the current state of knowledge on SCAD to address its demographic features, clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes, focusing on diagnostic algorithms and main multimodality imaging techniques.

Indexed as

coronary imagingmultimodality imagingmyocardial infarctionspontaneous coronary artery dissection

Identifiers

PMID36614955
PMCPMC9821637
OpenAlexW4313414648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.