Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36614948›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

The Bivalent COVID-19 Booster Immunization after Three Doses of Inactivated Vaccine Augments the Neutralizing Antibody Response against Circulating Omicron Sublineages.

Qiaren He, Shiyu Sun, Xi Chen, Zhenxiang Hu, Yan Zhang, Hua Peng, Yang-Xin Fu, Jiaming Yang, Long Chen

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05583357 early_phase1unknown statusnot on this map

A Single Center, Randomized, Open-labeled, Blind Endpoint Evaluation, Exploratory Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Bivalent Vaccine V-01D-351 as a Booster Dose in Participants Aged 18 Years and Older Vaccinated 2-dose or 3-dose Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine

TypeinterventionalSponsorLivzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsCOVID-19 PandemicArmsV-01D-351, CoronaVac
NCT05585567 early_phase1unknown statusnot on this map

A Single Center, Randomized, Open-labeled, Exploratory Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Bivalent Vaccine V-01-B5 as a Booster Dose in Participants Aged 18-59 Years Vaccinated 3-dose Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine

TypeinterventionalSponsorLivzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled48ConditionsCOVID-19 PandemicArmsV-01/V-01-B5, V-01-351/V-01-B5, V-01
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Qiaren HeThe Outpatient Department, Shaoguan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shaoguan 512026, China.
Shiyu SunGuangzhou Laboratory, Guangzhou 510005, China.
Xi ChenDepartment of Research and Development, Livzon Bio Inc., Zhuhai 519045, China.
Zhenxiang HuDepartment of Research and Development, Livzon Bio Inc., Zhuhai 519045, China.
Yan ZhangMedical and Clinical Center, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc., Zhuhai 519045, China.
Hua PengGuangzhou Laboratory, Guangzhou 510005, China.
Yang-Xin FuDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Jiaming YangGuangzhou Laboratory, Guangzhou 510005, China.
Long ChenThe Outpatient Department, Shaoguan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shaoguan 512026, China.
Guangzhou Experimental Station · CNShaoguan Railway Hospital · CNInstitute of Biophysics · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

Emergency Key Program of Guangzhou Laboratory EKPG21-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fourth dose of a COVID-19 vaccine has been recommended by a number of authorities due to waning immunity over time and the emergence of immune-escaping variants. Here, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the bivalent BV-01-B5 or V-01D-351 or the prototype V-01 for heterologous boosting in three-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (ICV) recipients, in comparison with ICV homologous boosting. One pilot study (NCT05583357) included 20 participants randomized at 1:1, either receiving V-01D-351 or CoronaVac. The other one (NCT05585567) recruited 36 participants randomized at 2:1, either receiving BV-01-B5 or V-01, respectively. BV-01-B5, V-01D-351, and V-01 were safe and well-tolerated as heterologous booster shots after three doses of ICV, with adverse reactions predominantly being mild and moderate in severity, similar to the safety profile of ICV boosters. The bivalent V-01D-351 and BV-01-B5 and prototype V-01 booster demonstrated remarkable cross-reactive immunogenicity against the prototype and multiple emerging variants of concern (VOCs), with the geometric mean ratio (versus CoronaVac) in particular being 31.3 (500 vs. 16), 12.0 (192 vs. 16) and 8.5 (136 vs.16) against BA.4/5 14 days after the booster, respectively. Taken together, the modified bivalent-formulation V-01 boosters induced robust neutralizing responses against multiple Omicron sublineages, better than V-01 and remarkably superior to ICV booster, without compromising the safety and tolerability.

Indexed as

bivalentBV-01-B5fourth doseV-01D-351

Identifiers

PMID36614948
PMCPMC9821285
OpenAlexW4313327565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.