ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
A Framework of Analysis to Facilitate the Harmonization of Multicenter Radiomic Features in Prostate Cancer.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training set augmentation and biology-aware harmonization improve radiomic models for lung cancer prediction in indeterminate nodules.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in urologic precision oncology: from algorithm to translational medicine (a systemized narrative review).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Training Set Augmentation and Harmonization Enables Radiomic Models to Detect Early Onset of Lung Cancer.Research square · 2025Article
- Cross-Scanner Harmonization of AI/DL Accelerated Quantitative Bi-Parametric Prostate MRI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Risk score model to automatically detect prostate cancer patients by integrating diagnostic parameters.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- HDL anti-inflammatory function is impaired and associated with high SAA1 and low APOA4 levels in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023Article
- MRI-Based Surrogate Imaging Markers of Aggressiveness in Prostate Cancer: Development of a Machine Learning Model Based on Radiomic Features.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Image harmonization: A review of statistical and deep learning methods for removing batch effects and evaluation metrics for effective harmonization.NeuroImage · 2023Review
- Multi-centre radiomics for prediction of recurrence following radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancers: Consequences of feature selection, machine learning classifiers and batch-effect harmonization.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pooling radiomic features coming from different centers in a statistical framework is challenging due to the variability in scanner models, acquisition protocols, and reconstruction settings. To remove technical variability, commonly called batch effects, different statistical harmonization strategies have been widely used in genomics but less considered in radiomics. The aim of this work was to develop a framework of analysis to facilitate the harmonization of multicenter radiomic features extracted from prostate T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to improve the power of radiomics for prostate cancer (PCa) management in order to develop robust non-invasive biomarkers translating into clinical practice. To remove technical variability and correct for batch effects, we investigated four different statistical methods (ComBat, SVA, Arsynseq, and mixed effect). The proposed approaches were evaluated using a dataset of 210 prostate cancer (PCa) patients from two centers. The impacts of the different statistical approaches were evaluated by principal component analysis and classification methods (LogitBoost, random forest, K-nearest neighbors, and decision tree). The ComBat method outperformed all other methods by achieving 70% accuracy and 78% AUC with the random forest method to automatically classify patients affected by PCa. The proposed statistical framework enabled us to define and develop a standardized pipeline of analysis to harmonize multicenter T2W radiomic features, yielding great promise to support PCa clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.