ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Discriminative Evaluation of Sarcopenic Dysphagia Using Handgrip Strength or Calf Circumference in Patients with Dysphagia Using the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenic dysphagia in elderly hospitalized patients: a retrospective cohort study based on data from a comprehensive geriatric assessment system.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Sarcopenic Dysphagia and Simplified Rehabilitation Nutrition Care Process: An Update.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This multicenter cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the discriminative ability of sarcopenic dysphagia (SD) using handgrip strength (HGS) or calf circumference (CC) in patients with dysphagia. Patients aged 20 years or older who were registered in a database at acute, rehabilitation, long-term care hospitals and home health care facilities were included. Logistic regression analysis was performed using SD as the outcome and HGS, CC, and other confounding factors as covariates, separately by sex. Algorithm-based SD diagnosis and HGS or CC were used as the reference and index tests, respectively. Their accuracy was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and cutoff values were calculated. Of the 460 patients, 285 (126 males) were diagnosed with SD. Logistic regression analysis showed that HGS (odds ratio [OR], 0.909; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.873−0.947) in males and CC (OR, 0.767; 95% CI, 0.668−0.880) in females were independently associated with SD. The AUC for HGS in males was 0.735 (p < 0.001) and CC in females was 0.681 (p < 0.001). The cutoff values were 19.7 kg for HGS in males (sensitivity, 0.75; specificity, 0.63) and 29.5 cm for CC in females (sensitivity, 0.86; specificity, 0.48). HGS in males and CC in females provided statistically significant information to discriminate SD from dysphagia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.